Capucine JauffretvsElla Seidel
ESYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Capucine Jauffret 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Capucine Jauffret |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Capucine Jauffret Capucine Jauffret is the more established WTA-level player with consistent hard-court experience, while Ella Seidel is a rising prospect sti...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Women's singles matches at WTA events are best-of-three sets, capped at three. An Over 2.5 pick implies a 3-set contest. Given Jauffret's sl... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Ella Seidel |
53%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Ella Seidel Training data through 2024-10 contains limited direct matches between these two; Ella Seidel holds a higher junior ranking and better recent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over_2.5 Training data through 2024-10 shows both players split sets frequently against similar opposition on hard courts. Limited head-to-head sugge... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Ella Seidel |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Ella Seidel Based on historical performance and general player trajectory within my training data through late 2025, Ella Seidel has shown slightly more...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Despite Seidel having an edge, Jauffret is likely to put up a strong fight in this match. Both players are known for competitive baseline pl... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Capucine Jauffret |
70%
Ella Seidel |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Capucine Jauffret Based on my training data, Capucine Jauffret is generally the more established player with a stronger record, particularly in WTA events. Wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Ella Seidel Given Jauffret's anticipated advantage, I expect her to win in straight sets. While Seidel could potentially push a set, Jauffret's ability... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Capucine Jauffret |
70%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Capucine Jauffret Based on training data through mid-2025, Jauffret has shown more consistent form on hard courts, while Seidel has struggled with injuries an...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 2.5 Both players are known for playing tight, competitive matches on hard courts, often going to three sets. Their head-to-head history suggests... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusCapucine Jauffret 3/5
Capucine Jauffret is the more established WTA-level player with consistent hard-court experience, while Ella Seidel is a rising prospect sti...
Training data through 2024-10 contains limited direct matches between these two; Ella Seidel holds a higher junior ranking and better recent...
Based on historical performance and general player trajectory within my training data through late 2025, Ella Seidel has shown slightly more...
Based on my training data, Capucine Jauffret is generally the more established player with a stronger record, particularly in WTA events. Wh...
Based on training data through mid-2025, Jauffret has shown more consistent form on hard courts, while Seidel has struggled with injuries an...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Women's singles matches at WTA events are best-of-three sets, capped at three. An Over 2.5 pick implies a 3-set contest. Given Jauffret's sl...
Training data through 2024-10 shows both players split sets frequently against similar opposition on hard courts. Limited head-to-head sugge...
Despite Seidel having an edge, Jauffret is likely to put up a strong fight in this match. Both players are known for competitive baseline pl...
Given Jauffret's anticipated advantage, I expect her to win in straight sets. While Seidel could potentially push a set, Jauffret's ability...
Both players are known for playing tight, competitive matches on hard courts, often going to three sets. Their head-to-head history suggests...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Capucine Jauffret
Claude Haiku 4.5
Capucine Jauffret
DeepSeek V3
Capucine Jauffret
Grok 4 Fast
Ella Seidel
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ella Seidel
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1cc5ed88b6760688…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 15:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30546,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T15:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 15:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ella Seidel",
"home": "Capucine Jauffret"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.