Botic Van De ZandschulpvsArthur Gea
AGAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 32.5 1/10 models |
Botic Van De Zandschulp 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Over 2.5 |
68%
Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Van De Zandschulp typically engages in competitive set contests with lower-ranked opponents on hard courts, often winning 3–2 or 3–1 rather...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Botic Van De Zandschulp Van De Zandschulp is an established ATP player with significant hard-court experience and has competed regularly on the US Open surface; Art... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
over 32.5 |
78%
Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 32.5 Even in a straight-sets win the total games typically exceed 32 on outdoor hard courts due to service holds. Gea can push sets to tiebreaks...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Botic Van De Zandschulp Botic van de Zandschulp holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than the younger Arthur Gea entering 2026. US Open hard courts... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Over 3.5 Sets |
75%
Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Sets While BVDZ is favored, Grand Slam matches often see younger, less-experienced players push for a set or two due to raw talent and high motiv...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Botic Van De Zandschulp Botic Van De Zandschulp holds a significant experience advantage on the ATP tour and in Grand Slams, having performed well on hard courts, i... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
2.0 |
80%
Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
2.0 Given Van De Zandschulp's considerable advantage in skill and experience, it is highly probable that he will win this match in straight sets...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Botic Van De Zandschulp Botic Van De Zandschulp is significantly higher ranked and has more experience at a higher level than Arthur Gea. While Gea shows promise, V...
4 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
over_3.5 |
60%
Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_3.5 Given the experience gap, Van de Zandschulp is favored to win, but Gea's competitiveness may extend the match into four sets. In best-of-fiv...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Botic Van De Zandschulp Based on training data through early 2025, Botic van de Zandschulp has more experience on hard courts, including a run to the US Open quarte... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 32.5 1/10
Van De Zandschulp typically engages in competitive set contests with lower-ranked opponents on hard courts, often winning 3–2 or 3–1 rather...
Even in a straight-sets win the total games typically exceed 32 on outdoor hard courts due to service holds. Gea can push sets to tiebreaks...
While BVDZ is favored, Grand Slam matches often see younger, less-experienced players push for a set or two due to raw talent and high motiv...
Given Van De Zandschulp's considerable advantage in skill and experience, it is highly probable that he will win this match in straight sets...
Given the experience gap, Van de Zandschulp is favored to win, but Gea's competitiveness may extend the match into four sets. In best-of-fiv...
Match winner
ConsensusBotic Van De Zandschulp 5/5
Van De Zandschulp is an established ATP player with significant hard-court experience and has competed regularly on the US Open surface; Art...
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than the younger Arthur Gea entering 2026. US Open hard courts...
Botic Van De Zandschulp holds a significant experience advantage on the ATP tour and in Grand Slams, having performed well on hard courts, i...
Botic Van De Zandschulp is significantly higher ranked and has more experience at a higher level than Arthur Gea. While Gea shows promise, V...
Based on training data through early 2025, Botic van de Zandschulp has more experience on hard courts, including a run to the US Open quarte...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Grok 4 Fast
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Claude Haiku 4.5
Botic Van De Zandschulp
DeepSeek V3
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1d4ffdb065eb8eb9…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 20:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38957,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Arthur Gea",
"home": "Botic Van De Zandschulp"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.