Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 4–6
Boston Red Sox logo

Boston Red SoxvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final4–6 Locked 37picks · 24 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Boston Red Sox 4–6 Texas Rangers

6 of 7 AIs leaned Boston Red Sox — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Boston Red Sox 6/7
Correct calls
1/7
Final
4–6

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Boston Red Sox 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Boston Red Sox L

Boston Red Sox have historically stronger home performance in June and typically field a more balanced offensive lineup at Fenway Park. Texa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Boston Red Sox L

The Red Sox have shown improved performance in recent games, including a 10-1 victory over the Rangers on Friday and a 6-3 win on Saturday....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Boston Red Sox L

Predicted from training knowledge through late 2025. Boston typically holds a slight home edge against Texas in interleague play. No current...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Texas Rangers W

Based on my training data through early 2024, the Texas Rangers demonstrated strong overall team performance, culminating in a World Series...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Boston Red Sox L

Without access to current form, player availability, or starting pitchers, this prediction relies on general baseball knowledge. Historicall...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Boston Red Sox L

Based on my training data through 2025-09, the Red Sox have a stronger home record and better overall lineup depth. The Rangers have struggl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/11
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 9 L

The totals market shows consistent Under pricing around 1.91–1.95 versus Over at 1.83–1.89, indicating market slightly favors the Under. A 9...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 52% over W

Both teams have demonstrated offensive capabilities in recent games, with the Red Sox scoring 10 and 6 runs in their last two matchups. The...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Predicted from training knowledge through late 2025. Historical scoring trends in Red Sox home games favor the over. Pitching matchups for t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5 W

Both the Texas Rangers and Boston Red Sox have historically featured offenses capable of putting up runs. Fenway Park, the Red Sox's home st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

In the absence of specific pitching matchups, park factors, or recent offensive trends, predicting the total runs is difficult. A lean towar...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Over 9.5

Both teams have offenses that can produce runs, and Fenway Park tends to favor hitters. Starting pitching matchups are not available from tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Boston Red Sox 4/12
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Boston Red Sox -1.5 L

Boston's home-field advantage and typical offensive capability at Fenway support a narrow spread lean toward the Red Sox, though Texas is co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 53% Boston Red Sox L

The Red Sox's recent home victories and the Rangers' road struggles suggest that Boston is likely to cover the -1 spread. ([cbssports.com](h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Boston Red Sox

Predicted from training knowledge through late 2025. Red Sox hold modest run-line value at home versus Rangers. No lineup or bullpen data av...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Boston Red Sox +1.5 L

While the Texas Rangers are projected to be the stronger team, winning by more than one run (covering the -1.5 spread) is never a guarantee...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Boston Red Sox ~1.56

The spread market shows the Boston Red Sox as underdogs with a point spread of +1.5. Historically, underdogs with this spread often perform...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Odds: 1.56 Edge: -9.1%
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% Boston Red Sox -1.5 L

The Red Sox are likely to win, but covering a 1.5-run spread is more uncertain. The Rangers can keep games close, especially with their bull...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Boston Red Sox 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Boston Red Sox

Early-game play often reflects starting pitcher quality and offense aggression in the first inning. Boston's home-crowd advantage and Fenway...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 54% Boston Red Sox

The Red Sox's recent strong starts in the first five innings, combined with the Rangers' inconsistent early-game performances, suggest Bosto...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Boston Red Sox

Predicted from training knowledge through late 2025. Early-inning home advantage for Boston appears consistent historically. Full starter in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 42% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers' overall team strength, as observed in my training data, suggests a slight advantage in starting pitching and early offens...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Boston Red Sox

Predicting the first five innings outcome without knowing the starting pitchers is highly speculative. I am giving a slight edge to the home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 56% Boston Red Sox

The Red Sox have a strong early-game offense and typically score in the first few innings at home. The Rangers' starting pitchers have been...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Boston Red Sox

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Boston Red Sox

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Boston Red Sox

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Boston Red Sox

55
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Boston Red Sox

54
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Boston Red Sox

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Texas Rangers

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: d826d0f378690ac0…
Kickoff
Sun, Jun 14 · 23:20 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2776,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-14T23:20:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:20:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Boston Red Sox"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-14T00:52:43+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    5 tool calls · 8 sources

    8 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →