Benjamin BonzivsKaren Khachanov
KKAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Karen Khachanov 4/5 models |
Over 39.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Karen Khachanov |
58%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Karen Khachanov Khachanov holds a significant career edge over Bonzi and is more experienced in deep Grand Slam runs. On hard courts, Khachanov's serve and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 4.5 Khachanov's dominant serve and break-point conversion should enable him to win in 4 or 5 sets without extending to the maximum. Bonzi has sh... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Karen Khachanov |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Karen Khachanov Khachanov holds the higher career ranking and better hard-court results in training data through 2025-09. Bonzi has shown inconsistency agai...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Both players have strong serves that can produce long sets on hard courts. Training data shows Khachanov often pushes matches to four or fiv... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Karen Khachanov |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Karen Khachanov Based on historical performance and general player profiles (training data through 2025-09), Khachanov typically holds an advantage over Bon...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 While Khachanov is favored, Bonzi is a competent hard court player and often capable of taking a set, especially early in a Grand Slam befor... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Karen Khachanov |
65%
Karen Khachanov |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Karen Khachanov Karen Khachanov is a significantly higher-ranked player with more experience at the Grand Slam level, including a past quarter-final appeara...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Karen Khachanov Given Khachanov's significant edge in skill and ranking, he is expected to win this match in straight sets. While Bonzi is capable of winnin...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Benjamin Bonzi |
55%
Over 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Benjamin Bonzi Training data through 2025-09 indicates Bonzi has been in good form on hard courts, with a strong serve and aggressive baseline game. Khacha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 4.5 Given both players have strong serves and are capable of holding, a best-of-five match is likely to go the distance. Bonzi's consistent base... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKaren Khachanov 4/5
Khachanov holds a significant career edge over Bonzi and is more experienced in deep Grand Slam runs. On hard courts, Khachanov's serve and...
Khachanov holds the higher career ranking and better hard-court results in training data through 2025-09. Bonzi has shown inconsistency agai...
Based on historical performance and general player profiles (training data through 2025-09), Khachanov typically holds an advantage over Bon...
Karen Khachanov is a significantly higher-ranked player with more experience at the Grand Slam level, including a past quarter-final appeara...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Bonzi has been in good form on hard courts, with a strong serve and aggressive baseline game. Khacha...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 39.5 2/10
Khachanov's dominant serve and break-point conversion should enable him to win in 4 or 5 sets without extending to the maximum. Bonzi has sh...
Both players have strong serves that can produce long sets on hard courts. Training data shows Khachanov often pushes matches to four or fiv...
While Khachanov is favored, Bonzi is a competent hard court player and often capable of taking a set, especially early in a Grand Slam befor...
Given Khachanov's significant edge in skill and ranking, he is expected to win this match in straight sets. While Bonzi is capable of winnin...
Given both players have strong serves and are capable of holding, a best-of-five match is likely to go the distance. Bonzi's consistent base...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Karen Khachanov
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Karen Khachanov
Claude Haiku 4.5
Karen Khachanov
Grok 4 Fast
Karen Khachanov
DeepSeek V3
Benjamin Bonzi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7adce2a886ded588…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 5 · 19:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 36169,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-05T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 05 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Karen Khachanov",
"home": "Benjamin Bonzi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.