Benjamin BonzivsIgnacio Buse
IBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Benjamin Bonzi 5/5 models |
under 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Benjamin Bonzi |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Benjamin Bonzi Benjamin Bonzi is a solid hard-court player with consistent ATP-level experience, while Ignacio Buse is a lower-ranked challenger competitor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Winston-Salem is a hard-court 250-level event where matches often extend to competitive three-set contests, especially in early rounds where... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Benjamin Bonzi |
55%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Benjamin Bonzi Benjamin Bonzi holds the edge in experience and hard-court results against lower-ranked opponents based on training data through 2025-09. Ig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under 2.5 Training data through 2025-09 shows Bonzi often closes out matches in straight sets on hard courts against similar opposition. Buse lacks th... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
78%
Benjamin Bonzi |
68%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Benjamin Bonzi This prediction is based on training data up to my last update, as real-time 2026 form is unavailable. Benjamin Bonzi is a more experienced...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Bonzi's significant advantage in hard court experience and overall ATP Tour level, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcom... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Benjamin Bonzi |
60%
Ignacio Buse |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Benjamin Bonzi Benjamin Bonzi is a more established player on the ATP tour with a stronger track record on hard courts, which is likely the surface for thi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Ignacio Buse Given Benjamin Bonzi's edge and likely dominance on this surface, the match is expected to be decided in two sets. While Buse could potentia... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Benjamin Bonzi |
55%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Benjamin Bonzi Based on training data through 2025-09, Bonzi has been a consistent top-100 player with strong results on hard courts, while Buse is a young...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under 2.5 Given Bonzi's edge in class and serving, he is likely to win in straight sets, making the under 2.5 sets the more probable outcome. However,... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusBenjamin Bonzi 5/5
Benjamin Bonzi is a solid hard-court player with consistent ATP-level experience, while Ignacio Buse is a lower-ranked challenger competitor...
Benjamin Bonzi holds the edge in experience and hard-court results against lower-ranked opponents based on training data through 2025-09. Ig...
This prediction is based on training data up to my last update, as real-time 2026 form is unavailable. Benjamin Bonzi is a more experienced...
Benjamin Bonzi is a more established player on the ATP tour with a stronger track record on hard courts, which is likely the surface for thi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Bonzi has been a consistent top-100 player with strong results on hard courts, while Buse is a young...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2.5 2/10
Winston-Salem is a hard-court 250-level event where matches often extend to competitive three-set contests, especially in early rounds where...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Bonzi often closes out matches in straight sets on hard courts against similar opposition. Buse lacks th...
Given Bonzi's significant advantage in hard court experience and overall ATP Tour level, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcom...
Given Benjamin Bonzi's edge and likely dominance on this surface, the match is expected to be decided in two sets. While Buse could potentia...
Given Bonzi's edge in class and serving, he is likely to win in straight sets, making the under 2.5 sets the more probable outcome. However,...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Benjamin Bonzi
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Benjamin Bonzi
DeepSeek V3
Benjamin Bonzi
Claude Haiku 4.5
Benjamin Bonzi
Grok 4 Fast
Benjamin Bonzi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5b3385123bcb843b…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 21:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 32259,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-28T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 28 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ignacio Buse",
"home": "Benjamin Bonzi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.