Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 2–5
Baltimore Orioles logo

Baltimore OriolesvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final2–5 Locked 28picks · 17 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Baltimore Orioles 2–5 Chicago Cubs

6 of 7 AIs leaned Chicago Cubs — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 6/7
Correct calls
6/7
Final
2–5

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Chicago Cubs W

The Cubs arrive with strong recent form (4W-1L in last 5) and superior offensive output (40 runs in 5 matches vs Orioles' 18), plus an extra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% Chicago Cubs W

Probable starters (Cubs LHP Matthew Boyd vs. Orioles RHP Shane Baz) and the Cubs deeper, more consistent offensive mix give Chicago a slight...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs W

The Chicago Cubs have shown strong recent form with four wins in their last five games, scoring 40 runs and conceding 32. The Baltimore Orio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs W

Cubs enter with superior recent form (4-1 record, +8 run differential) versus Orioles 2-3 mark and negative differential. Both clubs have si...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% Chicago Cubs W

Based on the provided team context, the Chicago Cubs show significantly better recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Baltimore Orioles (2W-3L)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs W

The Chicago Cubs' recent form (4 wins in their last 5 games) suggests they are playing better baseball than the Baltimore Orioles, who have...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Baltimore Orioles L

The Orioles have home-field advantage and a slightly better roster on paper, but the Cubs come in with better recent form (4-1 last five). R...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

The Cubs' offensive advantage and Baltimore's defensive struggles support a moderate home-field deficit. However, home-field advantage in ba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Baltimore Orioles +1.5 L

Given the narrow overall game projection and the fact Camden Yards home team advantage plus the Orioles' reliever reliability make a one-run...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs W

The Cubs' recent form and offensive strength suggest they are likely to win by at least two runs. Their superior performance in recent games...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Chicago Cubs

Cubs offensive edge and recent win streak give them a slight edge on the spread despite road status. Orioles have dropped three straight. No...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago Cubs W

Given the Cubs' superior recent form, high offensive output (40 runs in 5 games), and a positive run differential, they are likely to win by...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Cubs W

Given the Cubs' recent strong form and offensive capability, they are slightly favored to cover a -1.5 spread. Their ability to win games by...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% Baltimore Orioles -1.5 L

The game is expected to be close, so covering a 1.5-run spread is difficult. The Cubs have strong recent form and likely keep it within one...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 8.5

Cubs' offensive prowess (40 runs in 5 games = 8 per game average) combined with Orioles' weak defensive metrics (24 runs conceded in 5 games...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% under W

Both probable starters profile as mid-to-high ERA but with recent shorter outings (Boyd ~5 IP, Baz often 4–5 IP), and Camden Yards plus the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over L

Both teams have demonstrated high-scoring games recently, with the Cubs scoring 40 runs in their last five matches and the Orioles conceding...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Both lineups have posted high run totals lately, especially the Cubs. Home park factors and typical July weather favor extra scoring. Traini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% over L

The Cubs' recent five games have averaged 14.4 total runs per game, indicating a high-scoring trend. While the Orioles' games have averaged...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over L

Both teams have shown a tendency for high-scoring games recently, with the Cubs scoring 40 runs in their last 5 and the Orioles scoring 18....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have been scoring moderately well recently — Cubs 8.0 runs/game, Orioles 3.6 runs/game in last five. Starting pitchers unknown, b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Chicago Cubs

Early-inning trends favor the team with offensive momentum. Cubs' recent scoring pace and Baltimore's pitching vulnerability suggest Chicago...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

First-five outlook leans to the Cubs: Boyd's early-inning repertoire and the Cubs' top-order matchups (right/left splits) give Chicago a mod...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' strong recent form and offensive capabilities suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. Their recent performan...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Chicago Cubs

Cubs have carried strong early-game offense into recent contests. Home team has struggled to score in the opening innings during its losing...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 59% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs' strong offensive form and higher run production in recent games suggest they are capable of establishing an early lead. Wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' recent offensive performance suggests they are likely to start strong in this game. Their ability to score consistently in recent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Chicago Cubs

First five innings often favor the team with better starting pitching and recent form. Cubs have momentum from a 4-1 stretch; if their start...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

62
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

56
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Baltimore Orioles

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1058–806 · 57%
-609.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1132–1113 · 50%
-927.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 743–746 · 50%
-504.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1109–1141 · 49%
-832.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 878–934 · 48%
-732.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 1e9ede41f1102d3d…
Kickoff
Tue, Jul 7 · 22:35 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 10164,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-07T22:35:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 07 Jul 2026 22:35:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Baltimore Orioles"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWWWW",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 40,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 32
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 18,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 24
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 4,
            "home": 3
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →