Bahlinger SCvs1. FC Magdeburg
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
1. FC Magdeburg 4/4 models |
1. FC Magdeburg 4/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
no 2/4 models |
1. FC Magdeburg 3/4 models |
1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 2/4 models |
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg 3/4 models |
0-2 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
1. FC Magdeburg |
76%
1. FC Magdeburg |
55%
over |
62%
no |
59%
1. FC Magdeburg |
57%
1. FC Magdeburg -1 |
49%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg |
22%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
1. FC Magdeburg Bahlinger SC compete in Regionalliga while Magdeburg play in 2. Bundesliga, creating a large quality gap that training data shows typically...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
76%
1. FC Magdeburg Professional side expected to dominate lower-league hosts in cup format. No draw option reduces risk for the stronger team. Training knowled...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Quality mismatch often leads to open games with multiple goals for the stronger side. Both teams show decent scoring rates in recent matches...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
62%
no Magdeburg's defensive organization should limit Bahlinger to few chances. Lower-league sides rarely score against professional defenses in c...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
1. FC Magdeburg Magdeburg expected to win by multiple goals given squad superiority. Spread market rewards covering a one-goal margin for the away side. For...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
57%
1. FC Magdeburg -1 Asian line at -1 for Magdeburg captures the expected margin in this mismatch. Professional side rarely fails to win by at least two against...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
49%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg Magdeburg likely to control from the start and add further goals after half-time. Training data on similar cup mismatches shows away/away as...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-3 Expected scoreline reflects comfortable away win with clean sheet. Magdeburg's attack should create multiple chances against lower-league de... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
1. FC Magdeburg |
80%
1. FC Magdeburg |
65%
Over 2.5 |
55%
No |
68%
1. FC Magdeburg -1 |
65%
1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 |
60%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg |
15%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
1. FC Magdeburg Based on my training data through 2025-09, 1. FC Magdeburg operates at a significantly higher league tier than Bahlinger SC, indicating supe...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
80%
1. FC Magdeburg Given 1. FC Magdeburg's substantial advantage in playing level and form, they are highly favored to win outright. The Draw No Bet market red...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 1. FC Magdeburg has shown a strong attacking capability, scoring 9 goals in their last 4 matches according to provided context from my train...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
No While 1. FC Magdeburg has conceded goals in their recent matches, they are facing a considerably weaker Bahlinger SC side. In DFB Pokal ties...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
68%
1. FC Magdeburg -1 Given the substantial difference in quality between the two teams, 1. FC Magdeburg is expected to secure a victory by at least a two-goal ma...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
65%
1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 Based on the significant tier disparity, 1. FC Magdeburg is anticipated to achieve a comfortable victory against Bahlinger SC, likely by two...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg 1. FC Magdeburg, as the superior team, is expected to establish control and take a lead early in the match, reflecting their higher quality....
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-3 A 0-3 victory for 1. FC Magdeburg aligns with their superior attacking prowess and the expectation of them keeping a clean sheet against a m... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
1. FC Magdeburg |
55%
1. FC Magdeburg |
52%
over |
53%
yes |
53%
1. FC Magdeburg |
55%
away_ 0.0 |
30%
draw_away |
15%
0-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
1. FC Magdeburg 1. FC Magdeburg, a third-division team, is expected to have a significant edge over Bahlinger SC, a fourth-division team, in this DFB Pokal...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
1. FC Magdeburg Given the perceived strength difference and Magdeburg's likelihood of winning, the draw-no-bet market strongly favors them. The confidence r...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over While both teams have shown moderate scoring and conceding records, the DFB Pokal often sees upsets and can produce more goals than expected...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
53%
yes Bahlinger SC has conceded 3 goals in 3 matches, while Magdeburg has conceded 7 goals in their last 4. Both teams have shown they can score,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
1. FC Magdeburg Given that 1. FC Magdeburg is favored to win, they are also likely to cover a -1 handicap. This implies they are expected to win by at least...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ 0.0 The handicap of 0.0 means a push on a draw. Given Magdeburg's stronger league status and expected superiority, they should at least secure a...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
draw_away While Magdeburg is favored to win, Bahlinger SC has a strong home draw record, and cup games can be tight. A draw at halftime, followed by a...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-2 Considering Magdeburg's superior league status and their expected win, a 0-2 scoreline seems plausible. It suggests Magdeburg's attacking pr... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
1. FC Magdeburg |
80%
1. FC Magdeburg |
55%
over |
60%
no |
50%
1. FC Magdeburg |
45%
1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 |
50%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg |
20%
0-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
1. FC Magdeburg Training data through 2025-09: Magdeburg is a higher-division team (2. Bundesliga) compared to Bahlinger SC (Regionalliga). Magdeburg's rece...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
80%
1. FC Magdeburg Drawing no bet, the draw is excluded. Magdeburg's superior league level and recent form give them a strong probability to win. Bahlinger's l...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Magdeburg averages over 2 goals per game and total goals in their matches are high. Bahlinger may concede several against a stronger attack....
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no Bahlinger has scored only 1 goal per game in recent matches and faces a stronger defense. Magdeburg is likely to control the game and keep a...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
1. FC Magdeburg Magdeburg is expected to win by at least two goals given the league gap. However, cup games can be tight, so the -1 spread for away is a mod...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 The Asian handicap away -1.5 requires a two-goal margin. Given Magdeburg's superior quality, this is plausible but not certain. The probabil...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
50%
1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg Magdeburg is likely to lead at half-time and maintain the lead to full-time. The league quality gap suggests they will dominate from the sta...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
0-2 A clean 0-2 away win is a plausible scoreline given Magdeburg's scoring and defensive solidity. Bahlinger may struggle to break through, whi... |
|||||||||
Match winner
Consensus1. FC Magdeburg 4/4
Bahlinger SC compete in Regionalliga while Magdeburg play in 2. Bundesliga, creating a large quality gap that training data shows typically...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, 1. FC Magdeburg operates at a significantly higher league tier than Bahlinger SC, indicating supe...
1. FC Magdeburg, a third-division team, is expected to have a significant edge over Bahlinger SC, a fourth-division team, in this DFB Pokal...
Training data through 2025-09: Magdeburg is a higher-division team (2. Bundesliga) compared to Bahlinger SC (Regionalliga). Magdeburg's rece...
Draw no bet
Consensus1. FC Magdeburg 4/4
Professional side expected to dominate lower-league hosts in cup format. No draw option reduces risk for the stronger team. Training knowled...
Given 1. FC Magdeburg's substantial advantage in playing level and form, they are highly favored to win outright. The Draw No Bet market red...
Given the perceived strength difference and Magdeburg's likelihood of winning, the draw-no-bet market strongly favors them. The confidence r...
Drawing no bet, the draw is excluded. Magdeburg's superior league level and recent form give them a strong probability to win. Bahlinger's l...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Quality mismatch often leads to open games with multiple goals for the stronger side. Both teams show decent scoring rates in recent matches...
1. FC Magdeburg has shown a strong attacking capability, scoring 9 goals in their last 4 matches according to provided context from my train...
While both teams have shown moderate scoring and conceding records, the DFB Pokal often sees upsets and can produce more goals than expected...
Magdeburg averages over 2 goals per game and total goals in their matches are high. Bahlinger may concede several against a stronger attack....
Both teams to score
Consensusno 2/4
Magdeburg's defensive organization should limit Bahlinger to few chances. Lower-league sides rarely score against professional defenses in c...
While 1. FC Magdeburg has conceded goals in their recent matches, they are facing a considerably weaker Bahlinger SC side. In DFB Pokal ties...
Bahlinger SC has conceded 3 goals in 3 matches, while Magdeburg has conceded 7 goals in their last 4. Both teams have shown they can score,...
Bahlinger has scored only 1 goal per game in recent matches and faces a stronger defense. Magdeburg is likely to control the game and keep a...
Spread
Consensus1. FC Magdeburg 3/4
Magdeburg expected to win by multiple goals given squad superiority. Spread market rewards covering a one-goal margin for the away side. For...
Given the substantial difference in quality between the two teams, 1. FC Magdeburg is expected to secure a victory by at least a two-goal ma...
Given that 1. FC Magdeburg is favored to win, they are also likely to cover a -1 handicap. This implies they are expected to win by at least...
Magdeburg is expected to win by at least two goals given the league gap. However, cup games can be tight, so the -1 spread for away is a mod...
Asian handicap
Consensus1. FC Magdeburg -1.5 2/4
Asian line at -1 for Magdeburg captures the expected margin in this mismatch. Professional side rarely fails to win by at least two against...
Based on the significant tier disparity, 1. FC Magdeburg is anticipated to achieve a comfortable victory against Bahlinger SC, likely by two...
The handicap of 0.0 means a push on a draw. Given Magdeburg's stronger league status and expected superiority, they should at least secure a...
The Asian handicap away -1.5 requires a two-goal margin. Given Magdeburg's superior quality, this is plausible but not certain. The probabil...
Half-time / Full-time
Consensus1. FC Magdeburg / 1. FC Magdeburg 3/4
Magdeburg likely to control from the start and add further goals after half-time. Training data on similar cup mismatches shows away/away as...
1. FC Magdeburg, as the superior team, is expected to establish control and take a lead early in the match, reflecting their higher quality....
While Magdeburg is favored to win, Bahlinger SC has a strong home draw record, and cup games can be tight. A draw at halftime, followed by a...
Magdeburg is likely to lead at half-time and maintain the lead to full-time. The league quality gap suggests they will dominate from the sta...
Correct score
Consensus0-2 2/4
Expected scoreline reflects comfortable away win with clean sheet. Magdeburg's attack should create multiple chances against lower-league de...
A 0-3 victory for 1. FC Magdeburg aligns with their superior attacking prowess and the expectation of them keeping a clean sheet against a m...
Considering Magdeburg's superior league status and their expected win, a 0-2 scoreline seems plausible. It suggests Magdeburg's attacking pr...
A clean 0-2 away win is a plausible scoreline given Magdeburg's scoring and defensive solidity. Bahlinger may struggle to break through, whi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
1. FC Magdeburg
Grok 4 Fast
1. FC Magdeburg
DeepSeek V3
1. FC Magdeburg
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1. FC Magdeburg
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c982a450a221268b…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 13:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30106,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Kaiserstuhlstadion",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T13:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 13:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "1. FC Magdeburg",
"home": "Bahlinger SC"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLDW",
"record": "2W-1D-1L",
"scored": 9,
"matches": 4,
"conceded": 7
},
"home_form": {
"last": "DDD",
"record": "0W-3D-0L",
"scored": 3,
"matches": 3,
"conceded": 3
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 8,
"home": 8
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.