Aurora ZantedeschivsLina Gjorcheska
LGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Aurora Zantedeschi 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Aurora Zantedeschi |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Aurora Zantedeschi Both players are lower-ranked WTA competitors with limited public profiles in my training data (through 2025-09). Zantedeschi, competing at...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 At WTA 125K and ITF level, matches between evenly matched lower-ranked players tend to go to at least 3 sets more often than straight-set wi... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Aurora Zantedeschi |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Aurora Zantedeschi Aurora Zantedeschi holds a modest edge on hard courts based on career patterns against similar-ranked opponents. Lina Gjorcheska has shown i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Matches between players of this ranking level frequently conclude in straight sets on outdoor hard courts. Neither competitor typically forc... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Lina Gjorcheska |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Lina Gjorcheska Based on training data through 2025-09, Lina Gjorcheska has generally had a more established career and a higher career-high ranking compare...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Considering both players are generally strong on clay and might be adapting to a potential hard court, or if it's clay, it could be a grind.... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Aurora Zantedeschi |
70%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Aurora Zantedeschi Aurora Zantedeschi is the favored player based on general knowledge of player performance and typical tournament progression. Without specif...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
2.5 Given the perceived slight edge for Aurora Zantedeschi, a match going to three sets is plausible if Lina Gjorcheska can put up a fight. Howe... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Aurora Zantedeschi |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Aurora Zantedeschi Training data through 2025-09 indicates both are clay-court grinders, but Zantedeschi has shown slightly better recent momentum and consiste...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given the evenly matched styles and lack of a dominant serve on clay, a three-set battle is plausible. Both players are grinders who rely on... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAurora Zantedeschi 4/5
Both players are lower-ranked WTA competitors with limited public profiles in my training data (through 2025-09). Zantedeschi, competing at...
Aurora Zantedeschi holds a modest edge on hard courts based on career patterns against similar-ranked opponents. Lina Gjorcheska has shown i...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Lina Gjorcheska has generally had a more established career and a higher career-high ranking compare...
Aurora Zantedeschi is the favored player based on general knowledge of player performance and typical tournament progression. Without specif...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates both are clay-court grinders, but Zantedeschi has shown slightly better recent momentum and consiste...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
At WTA 125K and ITF level, matches between evenly matched lower-ranked players tend to go to at least 3 sets more often than straight-set wi...
Matches between players of this ranking level frequently conclude in straight sets on outdoor hard courts. Neither competitor typically forc...
Considering both players are generally strong on clay and might be adapting to a potential hard court, or if it's clay, it could be a grind....
Given the perceived slight edge for Aurora Zantedeschi, a match going to three sets is plausible if Lina Gjorcheska can put up a fight. Howe...
Given the evenly matched styles and lack of a dominant serve on clay, a three-set battle is plausible. Both players are grinders who rely on...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Aurora Zantedeschi
Claude Haiku 4.5
Aurora Zantedeschi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Lina Gjorcheska
DeepSeek V3
Aurora Zantedeschi
Grok 4 Fast
Aurora Zantedeschi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0d8f95edac8f11fd…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 08:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39186,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lina Gjorcheska",
"home": "Aurora Zantedeschi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.