Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Truist Park
Awaiting result · 994h 56m ago
Atlanta Braves logo

Atlanta BravesvsWashington Nationals

Washington Nationals logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

First 5 innings

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals typically track lower than full-game totals due to both teams' slower offensive starts and starting pitchers' dominance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

First-five outcomes are driven by the starting pitchers' short-form form; the probable matchup (Braves starter R. Lopez at Truist Park vs Mi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' starting pitcher is expected to perform well in the early innings, giving them an advantage in the first five innings.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 59% Atlanta Braves

Early innings favor the home starter and lineup familiarity at Truist Park. Nationals' road form has been inconsistent to start games. Train...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' strong starting pitching (historically) and powerful lineup give them an edge in the early innings. They often jump out to leads...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' starting pitcher is likely to perform better than the Nationals' starter, giving the Braves an early advantage. Their offense ha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' starting pitcher likely gives them an early advantage at home. However, both teams have similar recent form, and a draw is a pos...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Atlanta Braves

Both teams are in identical form (2W-3L over the last 5 matches) with comparable run differentials (+4 for Braves, -4 for Nationals). The Br...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 63% Atlanta Braves

The Braves have the home park advantage at Truist Park and the matchup data + team form favor Atlanta; CBS Sports' schedule shows Atlanta de...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Atlanta Braves

The Atlanta Braves have a strong home record and have been performing well recently, while the Washington Nationals have struggled on the ro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Atlanta Braves

Atlanta is the stronger club overall and has home-field advantage at Truist Park. Both sides enter with identical 2-3 records in the provide...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% Atlanta Braves

Based on historical performance and general team strength within my training data up to early 2023, the Atlanta Braves typically have a stro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% Atlanta Braves

The Atlanta Braves are having a significantly better season than the Washington Nationals, evidenced by their standings and recent form. The...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Atlanta Braves

The Braves are at home with a strong offense and better recent hitting, though both teams have mediocre form. Atlanta's bullpen and home fie...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: Atlanta Braves 55%

Over / Under

Consensus
over 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 8.5

Both teams have scored modestly over the last 5 matches (Braves 36 runs in 5 games = 7.2 per game; Nationals 30 in 5 = 6.0 per game). The co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% over

Truist Park is a hitter-friendly venue and both teams have shown multi-run outputs across recent games (team context: both clubs averaged mu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have potent offenses, and the Braves' home ballpark is known for favoring hitters, which could lead to a higher-scoring game.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Ballpark factors at Truist Park plus warm August conditions favor run scoring. Both lineups have shown offensive output in recent samples. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% over

Given the general offensive capabilities of both teams (based on historical data up to early 2023), and without specific starting pitcher de...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Both teams have shown the ability to score runs, and their recent form indicates a tendency towards higher-scoring games. Truist Park is a h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown ability to score runs, with recent games averaging over 8 runs. Atlanta's offense at Truist Park and potential wind fa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: 9.5 · Over 50%

Spread

Consensus
Atlanta Braves -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Washington Nationals +1.5

The Braves' modest home-field advantage does not justify a 1.5-run spread when both teams show identical recent form and the Nationals are s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Atlanta Braves -1.5

A -1.5 runline (Braves by 2+) is plausible because the Braves are at home in a hitter-friendly park and the Nationals' probable starter (Mil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to win by at least one run.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Braves superior talent and home status give them the edge on the run line. Visitor's recent form shows more defensive lapses. Training data...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Atlanta Braves -1.5

The Atlanta Braves, when at home against division rivals like the Nationals, frequently win by multiple runs, reflecting their deeper roster...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Atlanta Braves

Given the Braves' superior season performance and home advantage, they are favored to win by more than 1.5 runs. Their offense is capable of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Atlanta Braves -1.5

The Braves are favored to win but may not cover a 1.5-run spread consistently given both teams' volatility. The Nationals have kept games cl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Atlanta Braves

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Atlanta Braves

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Atlanta Braves

63
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Atlanta Braves

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Atlanta Braves

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Atlanta Braves

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Atlanta Braves

58

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1223–997 · 55%
-800.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 737–629 · 54%
-408.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 1522–1622 · 48%
-1,380.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1882–2015 · 48%
-1,829.7u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1066–1149 · 48%
-986.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1870–2062 · 48%
-1,753.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1562–1813 · 46%
-1,611.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Bookmaker odds

1 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted

Book Atlanta Braves Draw Washington Nationals
Draftkings 1.82 — 2.01
Book Line Over Under
Draftkings 8.5 1.84 1.98
Book Atlanta Braves Washington Nationals

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 626192824b53bd9a…
Kickoff
Sat, Aug 1 · 23:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 18399,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Truist Park",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-01T23:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 01 Aug 2026 23:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Washington Nationals",
        "home": "Atlanta Braves"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWLWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 30,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 34
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WLLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 36,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 32
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 21,
            "home": 24
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →