Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Truist Park
Upcoming · in 87h 27m
Atlanta Braves logo

Atlanta BravesvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Atlanta Braves

Both teams are in similarly poor form (2-3 over last 5), but the Braves play at home in Truist Park with a slightly better run-scoring avera...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 63% Atlanta Braves

Probable starter matchup favors Atlanta: Chris Sale has been excellent in 2026 and will be at home in Truist Park, which is neutral-to-pitch...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers have a slightly better recent form, with a 7-3 record in their last 10 games, compared to the Atlanta Braves' 3-7 record i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Atlanta Braves

Atlanta plays at home in a hitter-friendly park while Texas has shown weaker road results in recent seasons. Both clubs enter with similar 2...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Atlanta Braves

Based on historical trends and general knowledge from my training data through early 2024, the Atlanta Braves are a strong home team. Despit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers, despite similar recent form to the Braves, have a slightly better rest advantage and a more potent offense capable of exp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Atlanta Braves

Training data through 2025-09. Braves have strong home field advantage at Truist Park and typically have a potent lineup. Rangers have been...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5

Both teams combined for 58 runs across their last 5 matches (11.6 per game), well above a typical 8.5 line. Truist Park is a moderate hitter...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 68% under

Both probable starters (deGrom and Sale) suppress runs — Sale's 2026 season has been outstanding and deGrom remains a quality strikeout arm...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Rangers averaging 4.1 runs per game and the Braves averaging 4.8 runs per game. The p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Warm July weather and Truist Park dimensions typically boost run totals. Both lineups have shown power in 2025 data and rest days are high f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5

I am assuming a total line of 8.5 for this prediction, based on typical MLB game totals without specific 2026 market data. Both teams have s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

The projected total of 7.5 is on the lower side given the offensive capabilities of both teams and the potential for a higher-scoring game....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have scored decently in recent games (Braves 36 runs in last 5, Rangers 22). Truist Park's offensive environment and lack of ace...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Atlanta Braves -1.5 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Home teams with an extra rest day and a marginally superior recent run-scoring rate (+4 run differential) typically cover -1.5 spreads at mo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% Atlanta Braves -1.5

A -1.5 runline win for Atlanta is plausible because Sale is likely to keep this game low-scoring and Truist Park gives the home starter a sm...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

Given the Rangers' slightly better recent form and away record, they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. The Braves' recent struggles an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Home-field advantage and park factors give Atlanta the edge on the run line. Texas has struggled to cover away spreads in prior seasons. Tra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Assuming a spread of Atlanta Braves -1.5, I lean towards the Braves covering due to their home advantage and slightly better offensive outpu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Texas Rangers

Given the slightly better pitching matchup and offensive edge for the Texas Rangers, they are projected to win by a margin of at least two r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Atlanta Braves -1.5

The spread of -1.5 for the Braves is a fair assessment given their home advantage. However, baseball spreads are volatile and without starti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 4.5 (first 5 innings)

Early-inning totals typically run 10–15% lower than full-game lines due to pitcher freshness and reduced offensive exposure. With both teams...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

First-five innings outcome tilts toward Atlanta because Chris Sale's strength is inducing weak contact and he typically eats 5+ innings; deG...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Texas Rangers

The Rangers have a slightly better recent form and away record, which may give them an edge in the first five innings. The Braves' recent st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Atlanta Braves

Early-game lineups favor Atlanta against a road starter whose recent form is weaker. The Braves offense tends to jump on opposing pitching i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 57% Atlanta Braves

The first five innings are primarily dictated by the starting pitchers and early offensive performances. Assuming an average but slightly st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Atlanta Braves

Braves' ability to score early and their strong home performance gives them an edge in the first five innings. Rangers may struggle early on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings over

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

Both starting pitchers have been prone to giving up runs early in games recently. With favorable hitting conditions and potential for early...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Atlanta Braves

63
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Atlanta Braves

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Atlanta Braves

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Atlanta Braves

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Texas Rangers

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Atlanta Braves

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Texas Rangers

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1043–787 · 57%
-590.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 678–576 · 54%
-356.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1116–1095 · 50%
-909.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 735–738 · 50%
-496.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1012–1021 · 50%
-712.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 864–915 · 49%
-713.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1004–1080 · 48%
-917.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 670c861867cc068d…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 17 · 23:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 12815,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Truist Park",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-17T23:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Atlanta Braves"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 22,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 29
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WLLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 36,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 32
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 8,
            "home": 9
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →