Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 4–12
Athletics logo

AthleticsvsPittsburgh Pirates

Pittsburgh Pirates logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final4–12 Locked 32picks · 18 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus called it

Athletics 4–12 Pittsburgh Pirates

4 of 8 AIs leaned Pittsburgh Pirates — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/8
Correct calls
4/8
Final
4–12

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Athletics L

The Athletics have been rebuilding but play at home where they typically perform better. The Pirates have shown inconsistency in recent seas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Probable starters favor the Pirates: Braxton Ashcraft (5-3, ~3.30 ERA) has been reliable, while Aaron Civale was just reinstated from the IL...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Pittsburgh Pirates W

The Pittsburgh Pirates have shown a slight edge over the Oakland Athletics in recent matchups, with a 3-2 record in their last five encounte...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Athletics L

Athletics hold slight home edge in this matchup based on typical MLB patterns through 2025. Pirates have shown inconsistency on the road his...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Based on historical MLB team performance trends available through my training data up to 2025-09, the Pittsburgh Pirates typically exhibited...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Based on general historical performance trends in MLB, the Pittsburgh Pirates are slightly favored over the Athletics. Without specific rece...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Oakland Athletics L

Based on training data through September 2025, the Athletics had a slightly better record than the Pirates in 2025, but both are mid-tier te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Spread

Consensus
Athletics 2/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Athletics -1.5 L

The home team in baseball typically carries a modest run-line edge. Athletics at home should be slight favorites in a matchup without clear...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 W

Pirates have the pitching edge on paper (Ashcraft steady) and a potent offense capable of multi-run innings; if Ashcraft navigates the lineu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% Pittsburgh Pirates W

The Pirates have been slightly outperforming the Athletics in recent matchups, with a 3-2 record in their last five encounters. However, the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Athletics

Run line favors home team by narrow margin given venue and recent form trends. Pirates road performance has lagged in prior seasons. Trainin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Athletics +1.5 L

While the Pirates might have a slight historical edge based on my training data up to 2025-09, winning by two or more runs is a more challen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Athletics L

Given the slight favorability of the Pirates in head-to-head, it's assumed they might win by a larger margin. However, baseball is a game wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 35% Oakland Athletics -1.5

The Athletics are slight favorites but not dominant. Winning by more than one run is less likely in a close game. The Pirates covering the +...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5

MLB games in June typically average 8.5–9.5 total runs as temperature and conditions favor offensive output. Without current pitcher matchup...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% over W

Recent meetings have been high-scoring (11-2 on June 15, 6-5 on June 16) and the ballpark/weather setup (warm, wind ~11 mph with an outfield...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% under L

Both teams have been averaging low-scoring games recently, with the Pirates averaging 4.2 runs per game and the Athletics averaging 3.8 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Typical run scoring in interleague play lands near 8-9 runs. Both offenses project average output through late 2025 data. Training data thro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 W

Given the lack of specific starting pitcher information and assuming average MLB pitching for both teams based on historical data through 20...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over W

MLB games historically tend to average around 8-9 runs. Without specific pitching matchups or offensive trends, a slight lean towards the 'o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Over 8.5

Both teams had slightly above-average run totals in 2025. The Athletics' park (Coliseum) is pitcher-friendly but with two average offenses,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First 5 innings

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5 (first 5 innings)

Early-inning runs in baseball tend to be suppressed relative to full-game totals, especially without explosive first-inning offensive patter...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 61% Pittsburgh Pirates (first five innings)

Ashcraft has shown the ability to get through opposing lineups cleanly in early innings, while Civale just returned from the IL and could be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pirates have been starting games strong, often leading after the first five innings. Their recent performance indicates a higher likelih...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Athletics

Early innings tend to mirror full game lean toward home pitching advantage. Training data through 2025-09 shows home teams win F5 at 51% cli...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 45% Pittsburgh Pirates F5

Building on the slight historical lean towards the Pittsburgh Pirates from my training data through 2025-09, I anticipate they will have an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Pittsburgh Pirates

Early game performance often reflects the overall team strength. Assuming the Pirates have a slight edge, they are predicted to perform bett...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Pittsburgh Pirates

First five innings often favor teams with stronger bullpens or early offense. Based on 2025 data, the Pirates had a slightly better first-fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Athletics

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Pittsburgh Pirates

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Athletics

54
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Athletics

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pittsburgh Pirates

53
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Oakland Athletics

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 909c22518319d95d…
Kickoff
Thu, Jun 18 · 01:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 3478,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-18T01:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Pittsburgh Pirates",
        "home": "Athletics"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-15T07:40:49+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →