Athletics vs Pittsburgh Pirates
Kickoff · Tue, Jun 16 · 01:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c51cd76bd607faa3…
- Sport
- Tue, Jun 16 · 01:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 2795,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-16T01:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 01:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Pittsburgh Pirates",
"home": "Athletics"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-14T07:26:26+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 4-5 -1.2u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 5-5 -0.3u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 125-128 -87.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 168-149 -107.9u |
54%
Athletics |
52%
Under 8.5 |
51%
Athletics -1.5 |
53%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Athletics As of my training data (through September 2025), the Athletics have shown marginal competitiveness in recent seasons with improving roster c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under 8.5 MLB totals in mid-June typically reflect early-season pitcher depth and stabilizing bullpen arms. Both the Athletics and Pirates have histor...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Athletics -1.5 A one-run spread favors the home team marginally in a matchup where roster quality slightly favors Oakland. The Pirates' continued developme...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Under 4.5 First-five-inning totals are typically lower and more pitcher-dependent than full-game lines. Early-season bullpen freshness (mid-June) and... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 30-17 +24.4u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 34-47 -25.2u |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
60%
over |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pittsburgh Pirates have a slightly better overall record and have been performing well recently, with a 6-4 record in their last 10 game...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, with the Pirates averaging 5.2 runs per game and the Athletics averaging 4.2 runs per...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Given the Pirates' slight edge in recent form and overall record, they are likely to cover a -1 spread. ([baseball-reference.com](https://ww...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates' recent form and overall record suggest they may have a slight advantage in the first five innings. ([baseball-reference.com](ht...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 112-170 -91.3u |
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
51%
over |
51%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates Training data through 2025 shows Pirates with slightly better overall roster construction and pitching depth than the Athletics. Oakland's h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2025 shows both clubs playing in higher-scoring environments on average. June night games trend toward elevated run to...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Pittsburgh Pirates Athletics remain a below-average club in 2025-2026 projections while Pirates roster is closer to neutral. Run-line pricing typically gives a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Pittsburgh Pirates Early-inning scoring trends mirror full-game expectations with Pirates holding a modest edge. Both clubs have shown average bullpen usage th... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 4-7 -1.8u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 135-151 -121.4u |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
52%
Under |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Based on historical MLB team performance trends through my training data (ending 2025-09), the Pittsburgh Pirates typically hold a slight ad...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under Assuming both teams maintain historical tendencies of inconsistent offenses and potentially relying on developing pitching, a total of 8.5 r...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 Given the assumed slight advantage for the Pirates in the head-to-head, a -1.5 run line implies they need to win by two or more runs. While...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates The outcome of the first five innings heavily depends on the starting pitchers. Assuming the Pirates' hypothetical starting pitching quality... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 65-141 -96.1u |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
60%
over |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
58%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Based on training data through 2025-09, the Pittsburgh Pirates have generally performed better than the Athletics in recent seasons. While s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over My training data suggests a moderate tendency for games involving the Athletics to have a higher number of runs due to pitching inconsistenc...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Given the general historical performance advantage of the Pittsburgh Pirates over the Athletics, they are more likely to cover a moderate sp...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates have shown a stronger ability to start games strong in my training data, often having more reliable starting pitchers early in g... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 136-147 -106.2u |
55%
Athletics |
60%
Over |
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 |
55%
Athletics |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Athletics The Athletics are at home and have a slightly better overall record in my training data, but the Pirates have been competitive. Home field a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Both teams have middling pitching and offenses that can score. The Athletics' ballpark is hitter-friendly. With no dominant aces expected, t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 The Pirates are competitive and often keep games close. Even if the Athletics win, it's likely by a narrow margin. The +1.5 run line offers...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Athletics The Athletics have a decent starting rotation and home advantage in the early innings. The Pirates' bullpen is solid but starters are averag... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/7 |
over 3/7 |
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/7 |
Pittsburgh Pirates 4/7 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.