Ashlyn KruegervsAnna Frey
AFYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 2/10 models |
Ashlyn Krueger 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Ashlyn Krueger |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both Krueger and Frey are mid-tier prospects who typically play competitive, drawn-out matches rather than lopsided encounters. Hard-court t...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ashlyn Krueger Both players are lower-ranked WTA prospects competing in a hardcourt event (Philadelphia). Ashlyn Krueger has shown better consistency on ha... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under |
78%
Ashlyn Krueger |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Efficient serving from Krueger should keep total games low in a potential 2-set match. Limited head-to-head data suggests shorter encounters...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Ashlyn Krueger Ashlyn Krueger holds a significantly higher ranking and more consistent results on hard courts entering 2026. Anna Frey lacks comparable WTA... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
76%
Ashlyn Krueger |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Ashlyn Krueger's presumed professional advantage and experience on hard courts, she is likely to secure a straight-sets victory. While...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
76%
Ashlyn Krueger Based on my training data up to my last update, Ashlyn Krueger is a more established professional player with a higher ranking and more expe... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
2.5 |
95%
Ashlyn Krueger |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
2.5 Given Ashlyn Krueger's dominance and Anna Frey's lack of experience, it's highly probable that Krueger will win in straight sets. This sugge...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Ashlyn Krueger Ashlyn Krueger is a significantly more accomplished player with a higher WTA ranking and more experience on the professional tour, especiall...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Under 2.5 |
72%
Ashlyn Krueger |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Given Krueger's higher ranking and superior court coverage, I expect her to win in straight sets. Anna Frey's level is likely not enough to...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Ashlyn Krueger Based on training data through early 2025, Ashlyn Krueger has a higher WTA ranking and more consistent results on hard courts, which is the... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Both Krueger and Frey are mid-tier prospects who typically play competitive, drawn-out matches rather than lopsided encounters. Hard-court t...
Efficient serving from Krueger should keep total games low in a potential 2-set match. Limited head-to-head data suggests shorter encounters...
Given Ashlyn Krueger's presumed professional advantage and experience on hard courts, she is likely to secure a straight-sets victory. While...
Given Ashlyn Krueger's dominance and Anna Frey's lack of experience, it's highly probable that Krueger will win in straight sets. This sugge...
Given Krueger's higher ranking and superior court coverage, I expect her to win in straight sets. Anna Frey's level is likely not enough to...
Match winner
ConsensusAshlyn Krueger 5/5
Both players are lower-ranked WTA prospects competing in a hardcourt event (Philadelphia). Ashlyn Krueger has shown better consistency on ha...
Ashlyn Krueger holds a significantly higher ranking and more consistent results on hard courts entering 2026. Anna Frey lacks comparable WTA...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Ashlyn Krueger is a more established professional player with a higher ranking and more expe...
Ashlyn Krueger is a significantly more accomplished player with a higher WTA ranking and more experience on the professional tour, especiall...
Based on training data through early 2025, Ashlyn Krueger has a higher WTA ranking and more consistent results on hard courts, which is the...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ashlyn Krueger
Grok 4 Fast
Ashlyn Krueger
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ashlyn Krueger
DeepSeek V3
Ashlyn Krueger
Claude Haiku 4.5
Ashlyn Krueger
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6edc0fcf1a88edd5…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30535,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Anna Frey",
"home": "Ashlyn Krueger"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.