Arthur RinderknechvsSho Shimabukuro
SSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Arthur Rinderknech 5/5 models |
over_38.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Arthur Rinderknech |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Arthur Rinderknech Rinderknech is a left-handed serve-dominant player who has shown competitive results at hard-court majors; Shimabukuro is a qualifier-level...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Rinderknech vs. Shimabukuro should be a competitive first-round or early-round encounter; Shimabukuro's baseline resilience and willingness... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Arthur Rinderknech |
71%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Arthur Rinderknech Rinderknech holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results entering 2025. Shimabukuro lacks recent success against top-100 opponen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
over_2.5 Best-of-five format at US Open favors longer matches. Both players show competitive service games that limit quick sweeps. Training data thr... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Arthur Rinderknech |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Arthur Rinderknech Based on historical performance data from my training cut-off, Arthur Rinderknech generally possesses a stronger serve and more aggressive g...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Despite Arthur Rinderknech being favored, Sho Shimabukuro's resilience and competitive nature suggest he can push the match beyond three set... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Arthur Rinderknech |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Arthur Rinderknech Arthur Rinderknech, with a higher ranking and more consistent tour-level performance, is favored against Sho Shimabukuro. Rinderknech's expe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that this is a Grand Slam match, the potential for a closely contested encounter exists. While Rinderknech is favored, Shimabukuro has... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Arthur Rinderknech |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Arthur Rinderknech Based on training data through 2025-09, Rinderknech has a stronger overall profile on hard courts and a better serve, which typically prevai...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Given the gap in quality, Rinderknech could win in straight sets, but Shimabukuro's fighting style and ability to extend sets on hard courts... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusArthur Rinderknech 5/5
Rinderknech is a left-handed serve-dominant player who has shown competitive results at hard-court majors; Shimabukuro is a qualifier-level...
Rinderknech holds the higher ranking and stronger hard-court results entering 2025. Shimabukuro lacks recent success against top-100 opponen...
Based on historical performance data from my training cut-off, Arthur Rinderknech generally possesses a stronger serve and more aggressive g...
Arthur Rinderknech, with a higher ranking and more consistent tour-level performance, is favored against Sho Shimabukuro. Rinderknech's expe...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Rinderknech has a stronger overall profile on hard courts and a better serve, which typically prevai...
Over / Under
Consensusover_38.5 2/10
Rinderknech vs. Shimabukuro should be a competitive first-round or early-round encounter; Shimabukuro's baseline resilience and willingness...
Best-of-five format at US Open favors longer matches. Both players show competitive service games that limit quick sweeps. Training data thr...
Despite Arthur Rinderknech being favored, Sho Shimabukuro's resilience and competitive nature suggest he can push the match beyond three set...
Given that this is a Grand Slam match, the potential for a closely contested encounter exists. While Rinderknech is favored, Shimabukuro has...
Given the gap in quality, Rinderknech could win in straight sets, but Shimabukuro's fighting style and ability to extend sets on hard courts...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Arthur Rinderknech
Claude Haiku 4.5
Arthur Rinderknech
Grok 4 Fast
Arthur Rinderknech
DeepSeek V3
Arthur Rinderknech
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Arthur Rinderknech
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
58593bc0d12ddf5a…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31759,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Sho Shimabukuro",
"home": "Arthur Rinderknech"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.