Arthur RinderknechvsDaniil Medvedev
DMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Daniil Medvedev 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Daniil Medvedev |
65%
Under 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev is a top-5 player with exceptional hard-court performance and consistent US Open results; Rinderknech is a capable but lower-ranked...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 3.5 sets Medvedev's superior ranking and hard-court mastery suggest he will control the match and convert opportunities efficiently, closing out in s... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
74%
Daniil Medvedev |
61%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
74%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev holds far superior hard-court pedigree and recent US Open results compared to Rinderknech. Rinderknech lacks the consistent break-p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_3.5 Medvedev typically closes out lower-ranked players in three or four sets on hard courts. Rinderknech has shown limited stamina in five-set m... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Daniil Medvedev |
60%
3 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Daniil Medvedev Based on historical performance and general knowledge of both players up to my last training update (through 2025-09), Daniil Medvedev is a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
3 sets Considering Medvedev's typical dominance over lower-ranked opponents in Grand Slam matches, a straight-sets victory is the most probable out... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Arthur Rinderknech |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Arthur Rinderknech Based on my training data, Daniil Medvedev is a significantly higher-ranked and more accomplished player, especially on hard courts. Arthur...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given Medvedev's likely dominance, Rinderknech might win a set if Medvedev has an off day or Rinderknech plays exceptionally well. However,... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
92%
Daniil Medvedev |
78%
under_3.5_sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
92%
Daniil Medvedev Based on training data through mid-2025, Medvedev is a former US Open champion and top-5 player with exceptional hard-court consistency, whi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under_3.5_sets Medvedev's superior return of serve and rally tolerance should break Rinderknech's serve repeatedly, while his own serve holds are rarely th... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDaniil Medvedev 4/5
Medvedev is a top-5 player with exceptional hard-court performance and consistent US Open results; Rinderknech is a capable but lower-ranked...
Medvedev holds far superior hard-court pedigree and recent US Open results compared to Rinderknech. Rinderknech lacks the consistent break-p...
Based on historical performance and general knowledge of both players up to my last training update (through 2025-09), Daniil Medvedev is a...
Based on my training data, Daniil Medvedev is a significantly higher-ranked and more accomplished player, especially on hard courts. Arthur...
Based on training data through mid-2025, Medvedev is a former US Open champion and top-5 player with exceptional hard-court consistency, whi...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Medvedev's superior ranking and hard-court mastery suggest he will control the match and convert opportunities efficiently, closing out in s...
Medvedev typically closes out lower-ranked players in three or four sets on hard courts. Rinderknech has shown limited stamina in five-set m...
Considering Medvedev's typical dominance over lower-ranked opponents in Grand Slam matches, a straight-sets victory is the most probable out...
Given Medvedev's likely dominance, Rinderknech might win a set if Medvedev has an off day or Rinderknech plays exceptionally well. However,...
Medvedev's superior return of serve and rally tolerance should break Rinderknech's serve repeatedly, while his own serve holds are rarely th...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Daniil Medvedev
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Daniil Medvedev
Grok 4 Fast
Daniil Medvedev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniil Medvedev
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Arthur Rinderknech
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
515461386f085391…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 16:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35669,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniil Medvedev",
"home": "Arthur Rinderknech"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.