Arizona Diamondbacks vs Minnesota Twins
Kickoff · Sat, Jun 20 · 01:45 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
592d0f3bac8afc83…
- Sport
- Sat, Jun 20 · 01:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 4360,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-20T01:45:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 01:45:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Arizona Diamondbacks"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-16T06:25:03+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -30.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 20-47 -27.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 201-251 -196.7u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 232-276 -221.0u |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
52%
Over 8.5 |
48%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks As of my training data (September 2024), the Diamondbacks have been a stronger team with better pitching depth and have shown more consisten...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 MLB run scoring has remained relatively stable with average totals in the 8–9 run range. Without access to the specific starting pitchers, b...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 The Diamondbacks have historically been the stronger home team, but backing them at -1.5 runs requires confidence in a solid pitching advant...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks In early-inning baseball, home-team pitching advantage and lineup familiarity with the home park play a larger role. Arizona's starting pitc... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 51-65 -9.6u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 52-117 -86.0u |
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
over |
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks The Arizona Diamondbacks have a home record of 21-14, indicating a strong performance at Chase Field. The Minnesota Twins have a weaker away...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, with the Diamondbacks scoring 75 runs in their last 10 games and the Twins scoring 98...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks Given the Diamondbacks' strong home performance (21-14) and the Twins' struggles on the road (12-19), the Diamondbacks are likely to cover a...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks The Diamondbacks' home advantage and the Twins' road struggles suggest the Diamondbacks may lead after the first five innings. However, with...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 145-303 -211.3u |
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
51%
over |
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks Training data through 2025-09 shows Diamondbacks with slight home edge in interleague play; Twins road performance inconsistent in prior sea...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2025-09 indicates average run totals around 9 in similar late-June games; both clubs featured above-average offenses h...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks Diamondbacks home record historically outperforms Twins road results per training data through 2025-09. Spread value leans home given venue...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks First-five trends in training data favor home starters in day games at altitude; Twins early-inning scoring was below average historically.... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 14-46 -31.9u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 176-261 -223.1u |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
52%
over |
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
40%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on general MLB trends and historical team strengths from training data (through early 2024), the Arizona Diamondbacks typically hold a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Historically, both the Diamondbacks and Twins have had periods of solid offensive production. Without specific pitching matchups, a combined...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks Leaning towards the Diamondbacks to cover a -1.5 spread at home, given their historical competitiveness and the inherent home-field advantag...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
40%
Arizona Diamondbacks The first five innings outcome heavily depends on starting pitching, which is unknown for this 2026 matchup. Assuming a competitive game, th... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 84-212 -157.8u |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
over |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are projected to have a slightly better performance due to their historical strengths and the Arizona Diamondbacks' pote...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Based on typical MLB scoring trends and assuming average offensive capabilities for both teams, the total score is likely to go over the imp...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins Given the slight lean towards the Twins in the head-to-head market, a narrow spread favoring them is also likely. This prediction anticipate...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The prediction for the first five innings mirrors the full game prediction, suggesting the Twins will start slightly stronger or maintain an... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 201-294 -242.4u |
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
Over 8.5 |
35%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Arizona Diamondbacks Training data through early 2025 shows the Diamondbacks as a strong home team with above-average offense, while the Twins have notable pitch...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both teams have offenses that can produce runs, especially in a hitter-friendly ballpark like Chase Field. Training data suggests average ga...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 While Arizona is favored to win, the margin is uncertain. The Twins can keep games close, and run-line predictions are volatile. Spreading b...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Arizona's early-game offense and home bullpen advantage in the first five innings make them a slight favorite. Minnesota's starters have bee... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6 |
over 4/6 |
Arizona Diamondbacks 3/6 |
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.