Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 9–5
Arizona Diamondbacks logo

Arizona DiamondbacksvsMinnesota Twins

Minnesota Twins logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final9–5 Locked 24picks · 14 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Arizona Diamondbacks 9–5 Minnesota Twins

5 of 6 AIs leaned Arizona Diamondbacks — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6
Correct calls
5/6
Final
9–5

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Arizona Diamondbacks W

As of my training data (September 2024), the Diamondbacks have been a stronger team with better pitching depth and have shown more consisten...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Arizona Diamondbacks W

The Arizona Diamondbacks have a home record of 21-14, indicating a strong performance at Chase Field. The Minnesota Twins have a weaker away...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Arizona Diamondbacks W

Training data through 2025-09 shows Diamondbacks with slight home edge in interleague play; Twins road performance inconsistent in prior sea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Arizona Diamondbacks W

Based on general MLB trends and historical team strengths from training data (through early 2024), the Arizona Diamondbacks typically hold a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Minnesota Twins L

The Minnesota Twins are projected to have a slightly better performance due to their historical strengths and the Arizona Diamondbacks' pote...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Arizona Diamondbacks W

Training data through early 2025 shows the Diamondbacks as a strong home team with above-average offense, while the Twins have notable pitch...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Arizona Diamondbacks

In early-inning baseball, home-team pitching advantage and lineup familiarity with the home park play a larger role. Arizona's starting pitc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Arizona Diamondbacks

The Diamondbacks' home advantage and the Twins' road struggles suggest the Diamondbacks may lead after the first five innings. However, with...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Arizona Diamondbacks

First-five trends in training data favor home starters in day games at altitude; Twins early-inning scoring was below average historically....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 40% Arizona Diamondbacks

The first five innings outcome heavily depends on starting pitching, which is unknown for this 2026 matchup. Assuming a competitive game, th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Minnesota Twins

The prediction for the first five innings mirrors the full game prediction, suggesting the Twins will start slightly stronger or maintain an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Arizona Diamondbacks

Arizona's early-game offense and home bullpen advantage in the first five innings make them a slight favorite. Minnesota's starters have bee...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5 W

MLB run scoring has remained relatively stable with average totals in the 8–9 run range. Without access to the specific starting pitchers, b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, with the Diamondbacks scoring 75 runs in their last 10 games and the Twins scoring 98...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Training data through 2025-09 indicates average run totals around 9 in similar late-June games; both clubs featured above-average offenses h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% over W

Historically, both the Diamondbacks and Twins have had periods of solid offensive production. Without specific pitching matchups, a combined...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Based on typical MLB scoring trends and assuming average offensive capabilities for both teams, the total score is likely to go over the imp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5 W

Both teams have offenses that can produce runs, especially in a hitter-friendly ballpark like Chase Field. Training data suggests average ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 48% Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 W

The Diamondbacks have historically been the stronger home team, but backing them at -1.5 runs requires confidence in a solid pitching advant...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Arizona Diamondbacks W

Given the Diamondbacks' strong home performance (21-14) and the Twins' struggles on the road (12-19), the Diamondbacks are likely to cover a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Arizona Diamondbacks

Diamondbacks home record historically outperforms Twins road results per training data through 2025-09. Spread value leans home given venue...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Arizona Diamondbacks W

Leaning towards the Diamondbacks to cover a -1.5 spread at home, given their historical competitiveness and the inherent home-field advantag...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Minnesota Twins

Given the slight lean towards the Twins in the head-to-head market, a narrow spread favoring them is also likely. This prediction anticipate...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 35% Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 W

While Arizona is favored to win, the margin is uncertain. The Twins can keep games close, and run-line predictions are volatile. Spreading b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Arizona Diamondbacks

60
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Arizona Diamondbacks

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Arizona Diamondbacks

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Arizona Diamondbacks

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Minnesota Twins

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Arizona Diamondbacks

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 613c70a11afc0df5…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 20 · 01:45 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 4360,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-20T01:45:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 01:45:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Minnesota Twins",
        "home": "Arizona Diamondbacks"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T06:27:12+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 4 sources

    4 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →