Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 0–7
Arizona Diamondbacks logo

Arizona DiamondbacksvsLos Angeles Angels

Los Angeles Angels logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final0–7 Locked 31picks · 16 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Arizona Diamondbacks 0–7 Los Angeles Angels

6 of 7 AIs leaned Arizona Diamondbacks — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Arizona Diamondbacks 6/7
Correct calls
1/7
Final
0–7

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Arizona Diamondbacks L

As of my training data cutoff (September 2025), the Diamondbacks have been a stronger roster with competitive pitching and lineup depth, whi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Arizona Diamondbacks L

The Arizona Diamondbacks have a strong home record this season, while the Los Angeles Angels have struggled on the road. Additionally, the D...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Arizona Diamondbacks L

Arizona has shown stronger overall roster construction in recent seasons compared to the Angels. Home field provides a modest edge in this m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Arizona Diamondbacks L

Based on historical team trends from my training data, the Arizona Diamondbacks generally exhibit a more balanced roster, especially at home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Los Angeles Angels W

The Angels have a slightly better recent record and are playing at home, giving them a slight edge. While both teams are in similar standing...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Arizona Diamondbacks L

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Diamondbacks have a slight edge at home with a stronger overall roster. The Angels have struggle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 4/9
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 L

Slight home advantage (Arizona) + marginal franchise strength edge justifies a narrow moneyline lean, though the 1.5-run spread is tight and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Arizona Diamondbacks L

The Diamondbacks have been winning by multiple runs at home, and the Angels have struggled to cover the spread on the road.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Home team expected to hold a slight run-line advantage based on prior season performance differentials. Limited rest or travel factors assum...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 L

If the Diamondbacks are to win at home, historical trends from training data up to mid-2024 suggest they have the capability to secure a mul...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Los Angeles Angels

The spread market prediction is closely tied to the head-to-head market. Given the slight edge projected for the Angels, they are also favor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 L

Diamondbacks are favored but may not cover a 1.5-run spread due to potential close game. Angels could keep it competitive. Low confidence.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 8.5 W

MLB totals in mid-June typically cluster 8–9 runs. Without current starting pitchers, ballpark conditions, or recent offensive/defensive tre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over L

Both teams have potent offenses and have been involved in high-scoring games recently. The over has hit in 60% of their last 10 matchups.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Typical MLB scoring environments favor slight lean to the over in neutral conditions. Both offenses capable of producing runs against averag...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% over_8.5 L

Chase Field, the Diamondbacks' home, is historically known as a hitter-friendly park, potentially contributing to higher-scoring affairs. Bo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities and somewhat inconsistent pitching. Given the matchup, there's a slight inclination to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 8.5

Both teams have offensive potential, but pitching matchups are unknown. Based on general trends, a modest over is slightly favored. No live...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Arizona Diamondbacks 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

First-five innings totals in MLB average 3.5–4.5 runs. Without starting pitcher identities or early-inning offensive patterns, a marginal Un...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Arizona Diamondbacks

The Diamondbacks have been strong in the first five innings at home, while the Angels have been inconsistent early in games on the road.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Arizona Diamondbacks

Early game edge goes to the home starter in most projected alignments. First-five outcomes track closely with full-game home advantage. Trai...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 48% Arizona Diamondbacks

This market often hinges on the starting pitching matchup and early offensive execution. The Diamondbacks, with their generally more reliabl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Los Angeles Angels

The Angels' stronger recent form and home-field advantage are expected to translate to a better performance in the early innings. They tend...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Arizona Diamondbacks

Home team often has an early advantage. Diamondbacks' lineup depth may give them an edge in the first five innings. No specific starting pit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Arizona Diamondbacks

60
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Arizona Diamondbacks

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Arizona Diamondbacks

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Arizona Diamondbacks

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Arizona Diamondbacks

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Arizona Diamondbacks

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Los Angeles Angels

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: eea656384387451f…
Kickoff
Wed, Jun 17 · 01:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2852,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-17T01:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 17 Jun 2026 01:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Los Angeles Angels",
        "home": "Arizona Diamondbacks"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-14T09:21:43+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →