Arizona DiamondbacksvsCincinnati Reds
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Arizona Diamondbacks 4/7 models |
over 5/7 models |
Cincinnati Reds 2/7 models |
Cincinnati Reds 3/7 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
Under 9.5 |
54%
Arizona − 1 |
56%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Arizona Diamondbacks Arizona holds a 2–1 edge in the recent June series and shows marginally better run differential (−1 vs −2). Both teams are in similar form (...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 9.5 Chase Field's altitude (1,100 ft) and dry desert air normally favor offense, but recent team data shows both Arizona and Cincinnati averagin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Arizona − 1 Arizona's 2–1 series win vs Cincinnati, home-field advantage, and marginally superior recent form support a small line favor. The run differ...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 Early-inning scoring is suppressed when pitchers are fresh and bullpens have not yet entered. Both teams' recent scoring trend (3.8 and 4.0... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
57%
Cincinnati Reds |
56%
over |
62%
Cincinnati Reds +1.5 |
45%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Cincinnati Reds Probable starters are Andrew Abbott (CIN) vs Mitch Bratt (ARI); Abbott has more innings, strikeout upside and a longer track record while Br...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
over Both starters carry ERAs around 4.1 (Abbott ~4.07, Bratt ~4.17) and Bratt's recent starts show elevated walk rates, which increase baserunne...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
62%
Cincinnati Reds +1.5 If you prefer a risk-mitigated play, Reds +1.5 provides good value: my ML lean favors the Reds and the extra half-run cushion materially inc...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
45%
Cincinnati Reds Early-inning scoring is driven by the starters' command and the top-of-order matchups; Bratt's recent early-walk frequency and the Reds' top...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
60%
over |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds have a slightly better recent form, with a 4-1 record in their last 5 games, compared to the Arizona Diamondbacks' 2-3 r...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have been involved in games with high run totals recently, and the warm temperatures in Phoenix are conducive to higher-scoring g...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cincinnati Reds Given the Reds' slightly better recent form and away record, they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. The Diamondbacks' home advantage i...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Reds have shown a tendency to start games strong, and their recent form suggests they will maintain this trend in the first five innings...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
52%
over |
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Arizona Diamondbacks Arizona has a slight edge at home in a park that favors hitters and the recent H2H shows mixed but competitive results. Both teams enter wit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Chase Field and August weather typically inflate run totals. Both teams have allowed more runs than scored in recent form, pointing to an el...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks Home run-line value exists given the venue and the Diamondbacks' ability to win close games at Chase Field. The Reds' recent form shows defe...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks Starting-pitcher form is unknown but home starters have historically performed better in Chase Field. The first-five market reduces bullpen... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
53%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Cincinnati Reds +1.5 |
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on the provided head-to-head data from June 2026, the Diamondbacks won two of the three recent matchups against the Reds. Factoring in...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 8.5 Both teams exhibit moderate offensive and defensive numbers in their last five games, averaging around 4 runs scored and conceded, with over...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cincinnati Reds +1.5 While the Diamondbacks are favored slightly for the H2H due to home advantage and recent H2H wins, both teams' recent form is similar. The h...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks Given the Diamondbacks' slight overall edge in the head-to-head matchups and the home-field advantage at Chase Field, it's reasonable to exp... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
52%
over |
51%
Cincinnati Reds |
53%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds have shown slightly better recent form and possess a lineup that can exploit pitching weaknesses. While the Diamondbacks...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have demonstrated offensive capabilities, and their recent matches have seen a moderate number of runs. The Chase Field's favorab...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Cincinnati Reds Given the slight edge in form and offensive potential for the Cincinnati Reds, they are favored to cover a -1 spread. Their ability to gener...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds have a tendency to start strong and score early, especially against pitchers they can exploit. Their lineup's compositio...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
over |
50%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on training data through 2025-09, the Diamondbacks have home-field advantage and have won the more recent head-to-head meetings. The R...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Chase Field generally plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly, and both teams have been scoring around 4 runs per game recently. The start...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 The Diamondbacks are slight favorites, but the run line is a close call. Given the tight expected margins, I lean on Arizona winning by at l...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks In the first five innings, the starting pitchers are the biggest factor, and I believe the Diamondbacks' starter has a slight edge. The Reds... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusArizona Diamondbacks 4/7
Arizona holds a 2–1 edge in the recent June series and shows marginally better run differential (−1 vs −2). Both teams are in similar form (...
Probable starters are Andrew Abbott (CIN) vs Mitch Bratt (ARI); Abbott has more innings, strikeout upside and a longer track record while Br...
The Cincinnati Reds have a slightly better recent form, with a 4-1 record in their last 5 games, compared to the Arizona Diamondbacks' 2-3 r...
Arizona has a slight edge at home in a park that favors hitters and the recent H2H shows mixed but competitive results. Both teams enter wit...
Based on the provided head-to-head data from June 2026, the Diamondbacks won two of the three recent matchups against the Reds. Factoring in...
The Cincinnati Reds have shown slightly better recent form and possess a lineup that can exploit pitching weaknesses. While the Diamondbacks...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Diamondbacks have home-field advantage and have won the more recent head-to-head meetings. The R...
Over / Under
Consensusover 5/7
Chase Field's altitude (1,100 ft) and dry desert air normally favor offense, but recent team data shows both Arizona and Cincinnati averagin...
Both starters carry ERAs around 4.1 (Abbott ~4.07, Bratt ~4.17) and Bratt's recent starts show elevated walk rates, which increase baserunne...
Both teams have been involved in games with high run totals recently, and the warm temperatures in Phoenix are conducive to higher-scoring g...
Chase Field and August weather typically inflate run totals. Both teams have allowed more runs than scored in recent form, pointing to an el...
Both teams exhibit moderate offensive and defensive numbers in their last five games, averaging around 4 runs scored and conceded, with over...
Both teams have demonstrated offensive capabilities, and their recent matches have seen a moderate number of runs. The Chase Field's favorab...
Chase Field generally plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly, and both teams have been scoring around 4 runs per game recently. The start...
Spread
ConsensusCincinnati Reds 2/7
Arizona's 2–1 series win vs Cincinnati, home-field advantage, and marginally superior recent form support a small line favor. The run differ...
If you prefer a risk-mitigated play, Reds +1.5 provides good value: my ML lean favors the Reds and the extra half-run cushion materially inc...
Given the Reds' slightly better recent form and away record, they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. The Diamondbacks' home advantage i...
Home run-line value exists given the venue and the Diamondbacks' ability to win close games at Chase Field. The Reds' recent form shows defe...
While the Diamondbacks are favored slightly for the H2H due to home advantage and recent H2H wins, both teams' recent form is similar. The h...
Given the slight edge in form and offensive potential for the Cincinnati Reds, they are favored to cover a -1 spread. Their ability to gener...
The Diamondbacks are slight favorites, but the run line is a close call. Given the tight expected margins, I lean on Arizona winning by at l...
First 5 innings
ConsensusCincinnati Reds 3/7
Early-inning scoring is suppressed when pitchers are fresh and bullpens have not yet entered. Both teams' recent scoring trend (3.8 and 4.0...
Early-inning scoring is driven by the starters' command and the top-of-order matchups; Bratt's recent early-walk frequency and the Reds' top...
The Reds have shown a tendency to start games strong, and their recent form suggests they will maintain this trend in the first five innings...
Starting-pitcher form is unknown but home starters have historically performed better in Chase Field. The first-five market reduces bullpen...
Given the Diamondbacks' slight overall edge in the head-to-head matchups and the home-field advantage at Chase Field, it's reasonable to exp...
The Cincinnati Reds have a tendency to start strong and score early, especially against pitchers they can exploit. Their lineup's compositio...
In the first five innings, the starting pitchers are the biggest factor, and I believe the Diamondbacks' starter has a slight edge. The Reds...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Arizona Diamondbacks
GPT-5 Mini
Cincinnati Reds
GPT-4o Mini
Cincinnati Reds
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cincinnati Reds
DeepSeek V3
Arizona Diamondbacks
Grok 4 Fast
Arizona Diamondbacks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Arizona Diamondbacks
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
bb71f6b9e1ccbd6c…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 20:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 27837,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Chase Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T20:15:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 20:15:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cincinnati Reds",
"home": "Arizona Diamondbacks"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLWLL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 20,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 19,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 20
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 45,
"home": 45
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-06-14: Cincinnati Reds 3–5 Arizona Diamondbacks",
"2026-06-13: Cincinnati Reds 2–1 Arizona Diamondbacks",
"2026-06-12: Cincinnati Reds 2–5 Arizona Diamondbacks"
],
"matches": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
48 tool calls · 7 sources
7 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.