Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Tennis Singapore Tennis Open presented by BNP Paribas
Upcoming · in 11h 50m
AI

Aoi ItovsNao Hibino

NH
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 18picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

32 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 21.5 1/12
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Over 21.5

Given the expectation of Over 2.5 sets and the competitive baseline exchange between these two similarly-skilled Japanese players, the total...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Over 21.5

Given the expectation of Over 2.5 sets and the competitive baseline exchange between these two similarly-skilled Japanese players, the total...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over_2.5

Both players have shown competitive performances in recent matches, suggesting a closely contested match. The over 2.5 sets outcome is more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over_2.5

Both players have shown competitive performances in recent matches, suggesting a closely contested match. The over 2.5 sets outcome is more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Under 2.5

Both players prefer shorter rallies on hard courts and Ito's serve efficiency often leads to straight-set wins. Hibino has struggled to forc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Under 2.5

Both players prefer shorter rallies on hard courts and Ito's serve efficiency often leads to straight-set wins. Hibino has struggled to forc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Under 2.5 Sets

Given Nao Hibino's expected superiority, a straight-sets victory is a strong possibility against a less experienced opponent. While Aoi Ito...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Under 2.5 Sets

Given Nao Hibino's expected superiority, a straight-sets victory is a strong possibility against a less experienced opponent. While Aoi Ito...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Under

While Aoi Ito is favored to win, Nao Hibino is a solid player who can make matches competitive. However, Ito's strong serve and break point...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Under

While Aoi Ito is favored to win, Nao Hibino is a solid player who can make matches competitive. However, Ito's strong serve and break point...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 2.5

Two Japanese baseliners with comparable hard-court levels and no clear server dominance suggest a tight, grinding affair. Neither player has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 2.5

Two Japanese baseliners with comparable hard-court levels and no clear server dominance suggest a tight, grinding affair. Neither player has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Aoi Ito 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Nao Hibino

Both players are Japanese professionals competing on hard court at the Singapore Tennis Open. Nao Hibino has historically shown stronger per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Nao Hibino

Both players are Japanese professionals competing on hard court at the Singapore Tennis Open. Nao Hibino has historically shown stronger per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito has a higher career-high ranking (No. 82) compared to Nao Hibino (No. 56), indicating a stronger overall performance. Additionally,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito has a higher career-high ranking (No. 82) compared to Nao Hibino (No. 56), indicating a stronger overall performance. Additionally,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito holds the edge in recent form and movement on indoor hard courts where this Singapore event is played. Nao Hibino has shown vulnerab...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito holds the edge in recent form and movement on indoor hard courts where this Singapore event is played. Nao Hibino has shown vulnerab...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 75% Nao Hibino

Nao Hibino is a significantly more experienced player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more exposure to high-level competiti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 75% Nao Hibino

Nao Hibino is a significantly more experienced player on the WTA tour with a higher career ranking and more exposure to high-level competiti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito is the favored player based on her slightly superior recent hard court form and higher win percentage on this surface in the past ye...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Aoi Ito

Aoi Ito is the favored player based on her slightly superior recent hard court form and higher win percentage on this surface in the past ye...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Aoi Ito

No live data access here, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025-09. Aoi Ito is the younger, higher-ceiling left-hander with a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Aoi Ito

No live data access here, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025-09. Aoi Ito is the younger, higher-ceiling left-hander with a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Nao Hibino

75
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Nao Hibino

75
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Aoi Ito

65
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Aoi Ito

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Aoi Ito

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Aoi Ito

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Nao Hibino

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Nao Hibino

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Aoi Ito

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Aoi Ito

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Aoi Ito

54
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Aoi Ito

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2446–1994 · 55%
-1,601.7u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2446–1994 · 55%
-1,601.7u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1474–1258 · 54%
-816.2u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1474–1258 · 54%
-816.2u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2142–2300 · 48%
-1,974.1u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2142–2300 · 48%
-1,974.1u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3332–3618 · 48%
-3,134.9u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3332–3618 · 48%
-3,134.9u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4052–4448 · 48%
-4,077.3u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4052–4448 · 48%
-4,077.3u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4014–4588 · 47%
-3,970.9u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4014–4588 · 47%
-3,970.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3376–4008 · 46%
-3,605.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3376–4008 · 46%
-3,605.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Team news

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 05da3662d0831746…
Kickoff
Sun, Sep 20 · 04:00 GMT+0200
Markets
Match winner · Total sets · Total games
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 46441,
        "sport": "tennis",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Singapore Tennis Open presented by BNP Paribas",
        "starts_at": "2026-09-20T04:00:00+02:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Nao Hibino",
        "home": "Aoi Ito"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
        "Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
        "Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
        "Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals_sets",
        "totals_games"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →