Anouk KoevermansvsMariam Bolkvadze
MBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Anouk Koevermans 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Anouk Koevermans |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anouk Koevermans Both players are relatively lower-ranked qualifiers/wildcards at the 2026 US Open; Koevermans has shown more consistent hard-court form in r...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Koevermans vs Bolkvadze is a close matchup on hard court with no dominant serve superiority expected. Both players tend to produce competiti... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Mariam Bolkvadze Training data through 2024 shows Bolkvadze with more hard-court experience and recent ITF wins on the surface compared to Koevermans. No hea...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Training data through 2024 indicates Koevermans often exits early in straight sets on hard courts. Bolkvadze's experience suggests she close... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Anouk Koevermans |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Anouk Koevermans Based on my training data up to my last update, Koevermans, while younger, showed strong developmental promise in the years leading up to 20...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Considering the players' profiles from my training data, both are capable competitors. Bolkvadze's experience combined with Koevermans' pote... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Anouk Koevermans |
70%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Anouk Koevermans Anouk Koevermans is the favorite based on general knowledge of player performance. Koevermans generally has a stronger profile on hard court...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
2.0 Given Anouk Koevermans' likely advantage, this match is expected to be completed in two sets. While Bolkvadze might pose some challenge, Koe... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Anouk Koevermans |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Anouk Koevermans Training data through 2025-09: Koevermans has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more aggressive baseline game suited to the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players have competitive styles that often lead to three-set matches in Grand Slam openers. Bolkvadze's defensive consistency can exten... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnouk Koevermans 4/5
Both players are relatively lower-ranked qualifiers/wildcards at the 2026 US Open; Koevermans has shown more consistent hard-court form in r...
Training data through 2024 shows Bolkvadze with more hard-court experience and recent ITF wins on the surface compared to Koevermans. No hea...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Koevermans, while younger, showed strong developmental promise in the years leading up to 20...
Anouk Koevermans is the favorite based on general knowledge of player performance. Koevermans generally has a stronger profile on hard court...
Training data through 2025-09: Koevermans has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more aggressive baseline game suited to the...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 Sets 1/10
Koevermans vs Bolkvadze is a close matchup on hard court with no dominant serve superiority expected. Both players tend to produce competiti...
Training data through 2024 indicates Koevermans often exits early in straight sets on hard courts. Bolkvadze's experience suggests she close...
Considering the players' profiles from my training data, both are capable competitors. Bolkvadze's experience combined with Koevermans' pote...
Given Anouk Koevermans' likely advantage, this match is expected to be completed in two sets. While Bolkvadze might pose some challenge, Koe...
Both players have competitive styles that often lead to three-set matches in Grand Slam openers. Bolkvadze's defensive consistency can exten...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anouk Koevermans
DeepSeek V3
Anouk Koevermans
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anouk Koevermans
Grok 4 Fast
Mariam Bolkvadze
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Anouk Koevermans
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a64c7db50968ce5a…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31659,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Mariam Bolkvadze",
"home": "Anouk Koevermans"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.