Anna BlinkovavsValentina Mediorreal Arias
VMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 2.5 1/10 models |
Anna Blinkova 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
62%
Anna Blinkova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 In WTA hard-court matches between a ranked player and a lower-ranked challenger, competitive sets are common. Blinkova is favored but not so...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anna Blinkova Anna Blinkova is a more established WTA player with higher ranking and tournament experience than Valentina Mediorreal Arias, who is a lower... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
67%
under 2.5 |
81%
Anna Blinkova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
67%
under 2.5 Best-of-three format and large rating gap favor a straight-sets outcome. Training knowledge shows Blinkova routinely closes out lower-ranked...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
81%
Anna Blinkova Anna Blinkova holds a far higher ranking and stronger overall record than Valentina Mediorreal Arias per training data through 2023. The 202... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
2 sets |
85%
Anna Blinkova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
2 sets Given the expected disparity in skill and experience, Anna Blinkova is highly favored to win this match in straight sets. It is unlikely tha...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Anna Blinkova This prediction is based on general player profiles from training data, as the match is scheduled for 2026. Anna Blinkova is a more establis... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Valentina Mediorreal Arias |
65%
Anna Blinkova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Valentina Mediorreal Arias Given Blinkova's edge, it's likely she will win in straight sets. While Mediorreal Arias may pose some challenge, Blinkova's ability to cont...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Anna Blinkova Based on training data, Anna Blinkova has a significantly higher career ranking and more experience on the WTA tour than Valentina Mediorrea... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Home -1.5 sets |
65%
Anna Blinkova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Home -1.5 sets Blinkova is favored, so the most probable outcome is a straight-sets win. However, Mediorreal Arias may be competitive, making a 2-1 set sco...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Anna Blinkova Based on training data up to early 2025, Anna Blinkova has consistently ranked within the top 100, while Mediorreal Arias is lower ranked. B... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2.5 1/10
In WTA hard-court matches between a ranked player and a lower-ranked challenger, competitive sets are common. Blinkova is favored but not so...
Best-of-three format and large rating gap favor a straight-sets outcome. Training knowledge shows Blinkova routinely closes out lower-ranked...
Given the expected disparity in skill and experience, Anna Blinkova is highly favored to win this match in straight sets. It is unlikely tha...
Given Blinkova's edge, it's likely she will win in straight sets. While Mediorreal Arias may pose some challenge, Blinkova's ability to cont...
Blinkova is favored, so the most probable outcome is a straight-sets win. However, Mediorreal Arias may be competitive, making a 2-1 set sco...
Match winner
ConsensusAnna Blinkova 5/5
Anna Blinkova is a more established WTA player with higher ranking and tournament experience than Valentina Mediorreal Arias, who is a lower...
Anna Blinkova holds a far higher ranking and stronger overall record than Valentina Mediorreal Arias per training data through 2023. The 202...
This prediction is based on general player profiles from training data, as the match is scheduled for 2026. Anna Blinkova is a more establis...
Based on training data, Anna Blinkova has a significantly higher career ranking and more experience on the WTA tour than Valentina Mediorrea...
Based on training data up to early 2025, Anna Blinkova has consistently ranked within the top 100, while Mediorreal Arias is lower ranked. B...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Anna Blinkova
Grok 4 Fast
Anna Blinkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anna Blinkova
DeepSeek V3
Anna Blinkova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anna Blinkova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f572344ac7379e9f…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 22:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39002,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Valentina Mediorreal Arias",
"home": "Anna Blinkova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.