Anna BlinkovavsJulia Riera
JRYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Anna Blinkova 5/5 models |
under_2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Anna Blinkova |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anna Blinkova Anna Blinkova is a more established WTA player with superior hard-court credentials and higher ranking than Julia Riera, who is a lower-rank...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 The Kia Open is a WTA-level event, and Blinkova–Riera is likely a mid-round or qualifying match. Even with a favourite (Blinkova), Riera has... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Anna Blinkova |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anna Blinkova Anna Blinkova holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results in available data through 2025. Julia Riera has shown inconsistency on no...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Both players prefer shorter matches on hard courts and show solid serve stats historically. Limited recent form data through 2025 points to... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
62%
Anna Blinkova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anna Blinkova Based on my training data up to the present, Anna Blinkova generally performs better on hard courts than Julia Riera, who is primarily a cla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Despite Blinkova's general advantage on hard courts, Riera is known for her fighting spirit and has shown resilience even on less preferred... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Anna Blinkova |
65%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Anna Blinkova Based on training data, Anna Blinkova generally has a stronger hardcourt game and has achieved higher rankings than Julia Riera. Blinkova's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.0 The match is expected to be competitive but Blinkova's slightly superior hardcourt prowess should allow her to win in straight sets. Riera i... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Anna Blinkova |
55%
Julia Riera |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Anna Blinkova No live access, so predicting from training knowledge through 2025: Blinkova is the more established tour-level player with a bigger serve a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Julia Riera Neither player is a dominant top-tier server, so Riera has realistic chances to steal a set even in defeat, which pushes toward a decision i... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnna Blinkova 5/5
Anna Blinkova is a more established WTA player with superior hard-court credentials and higher ranking than Julia Riera, who is a lower-rank...
Anna Blinkova holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results in available data through 2025. Julia Riera has shown inconsistency on no...
Based on my training data up to the present, Anna Blinkova generally performs better on hard courts than Julia Riera, who is primarily a cla...
Based on training data, Anna Blinkova generally has a stronger hardcourt game and has achieved higher rankings than Julia Riera. Blinkova's...
No live access, so predicting from training knowledge through 2025: Blinkova is the more established tour-level player with a bigger serve a...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_2.5 1/10
The Kia Open is a WTA-level event, and Blinkova–Riera is likely a mid-round or qualifying match. Even with a favourite (Blinkova), Riera has...
Both players prefer shorter matches on hard courts and show solid serve stats historically. Limited recent form data through 2025 points to...
Despite Blinkova's general advantage on hard courts, Riera is known for her fighting spirit and has shown resilience even on less preferred...
The match is expected to be competitive but Blinkova's slightly superior hardcourt prowess should allow her to win in straight sets. Riera i...
Neither player is a dominant top-tier server, so Riera has realistic chances to steal a set even in defeat, which pushes toward a decision i...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Anna Blinkova
Grok 4 Fast
Anna Blinkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Anna Blinkova
DeepSeek V3
Anna Blinkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anna Blinkova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9c14f6fcf3768316…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 10 · 23:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39975,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-10T23:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Julia Riera",
"home": "Anna Blinkova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.