Ann LivsCamila Osorio
COYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Ann Li 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Ann Li |
54%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Ann Li Ann Li has shown stronger consistency on hard courts in recent seasons and benefits from a solid serve-and-volley game suited to faster surf...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 Both players typically engage in competitive baseline rallies and neither has a dominant serve that consistently produces breadth of break-f... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Ann Li |
58%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ann Li Training data through 2025-09 shows Ann Li holding a higher ranking and stronger hard-court results than Camila Osorio. Osorio's game is mor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates Li typically dispatches lower-ranked opponents in straight sets on hard courts. Osorio has shown lim... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Ann Li |
55%
Camila Osorio |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Ann Li This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future (2026). Ann Li generally performs stronger...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Camila Osorio Based on my training data and the surface advantage for Ann Li, a straight-sets victory is a plausible outcome. However, Camila Osorio is kn... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Ann Li |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Ann Li Based on training data, Ann Li has a slight edge over Camila Osorio in head-to-head matches. Li's aggressive baseline play and solid serve a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given the evenness suggested by the h2h and the potential for both players to hold serve, a three-set match is a distinct possibility. Neith... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Ann Li |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Ann Li Based on training data through 2025-09, Ann Li has had a more consistent hard-court game and better recent form on outdoor hard courts compa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Given Ann Li's aggressive style and expected superiority on hard courts, I anticipate she can win in straight sets against a player who may... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnn Li 5/5
Ann Li has shown stronger consistency on hard courts in recent seasons and benefits from a solid serve-and-volley game suited to faster surf...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Ann Li holding a higher ranking and stronger hard-court results than Camila Osorio. Osorio's game is mor...
This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future (2026). Ann Li generally performs stronger...
Based on training data, Ann Li has a slight edge over Camila Osorio in head-to-head matches. Li's aggressive baseline play and solid serve a...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Ann Li has had a more consistent hard-court game and better recent form on outdoor hard courts compa...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players typically engage in competitive baseline rallies and neither has a dominant serve that consistently produces breadth of break-f...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Li typically dispatches lower-ranked opponents in straight sets on hard courts. Osorio has shown lim...
Based on my training data and the surface advantage for Ann Li, a straight-sets victory is a plausible outcome. However, Camila Osorio is kn...
Given the evenness suggested by the h2h and the potential for both players to hold serve, a three-set match is a distinct possibility. Neith...
Given Ann Li's aggressive style and expected superiority on hard courts, I anticipate she can win in straight sets against a player who may...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Ann Li
DeepSeek V3
Ann Li
Grok 4 Fast
Ann Li
Claude Haiku 4.5
Ann Li
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ann Li
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f5b2cfbfce63bb6a…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30557,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Camila Osorio",
"home": "Ann Li"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.