Ann LivsAlycia Parks
APAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alycia Parks 3/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alycia Parks |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alycia Parks Alycia Parks enters 2026 as a rising player with stronger baseline power and first-serve dominance on hard courts. Ann Li has shown inconsis...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Best-of-three format at a smaller hard-court event often produces competitive matches with moderate-length sets. Parks' power will be offset... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
73%
Ann Li |
61%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
73%
Ann Li Ann Li holds the superior ranking and recent results on hard courts compared to Alycia Parks. Parks' power game can produce upsets but her i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 2.5 Li is the stronger player and typically closes out matches in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents. Parks can force a third set with... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
53%
Alycia Parks |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Alycia Parks This prediction is based on training data knowledge from before 2026, as the match is far in the future. Alycia Parks possesses a more aggre...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets This prediction is based on training data knowledge from before 2026, as the match is far in the future. Both players are capable on hard co... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Ann Li |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Ann Li Based on training data, Ann Li has shown a slightly better historical performance in head-to-head matchups and overall consistency on hard c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over This is projected to be a closely contested match between two players with comparable skill sets. Both players have the ability to win sets,... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Alycia Parks |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alycia Parks Training data through 2025-09: Parks has a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game suited to hard courts, while Li is more consistent bu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players have similar levels and the match is expected to be competitive, likely going to three sets. Parks' serve can dominate but Li's... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlycia Parks 3/5
Alycia Parks enters 2026 as a rising player with stronger baseline power and first-serve dominance on hard courts. Ann Li has shown inconsis...
Ann Li holds the superior ranking and recent results on hard courts compared to Alycia Parks. Parks' power game can produce upsets but her i...
This prediction is based on training data knowledge from before 2026, as the match is far in the future. Alycia Parks possesses a more aggre...
Based on training data, Ann Li has shown a slightly better historical performance in head-to-head matchups and overall consistency on hard c...
Training data through 2025-09: Parks has a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game suited to hard courts, while Li is more consistent bu...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Best-of-three format at a smaller hard-court event often produces competitive matches with moderate-length sets. Parks' power will be offset...
Li is the stronger player and typically closes out matches in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents. Parks can force a third set with...
This prediction is based on training data knowledge from before 2026, as the match is far in the future. Both players are capable on hard co...
This is projected to be a closely contested match between two players with comparable skill sets. Both players have the ability to win sets,...
Both players have similar levels and the match is expected to be competitive, likely going to three sets. Parks' serve can dominate but Li's...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Ann Li
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alycia Parks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ann Li
DeepSeek V3
Alycia Parks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alycia Parks
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
372a1191598f4c56…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 21:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31711,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alycia Parks",
"home": "Ann Li"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.