Angela Fita BoludavsAndrea Lazaro Garcia
ALAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Angela Fita Boluda 5/5 models |
over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Angela Fita Boluda |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Angela Fita Boluda Angela Fita Boluda is the higher-ranked Spanish player with more established WTA experience and a stronger baseline game. Andrea Lazaro Garc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive and neither is a dominant force; grass courts often produce longer rallies and tighter break-point situations t... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Angela Fita Boluda |
58%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Angela Fita Boluda Training data through 2023 provides minimal detail on either player. Angela Fita Boluda holds a slight edge on clay surfaces common to this...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 2.5 Training data through 2023 shows these lower-ranked players often split sets on clay. Serve and return inconsistencies increase likelihood o... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
53%
Angela Fita Boluda |
60%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Angela Fita Boluda This prediction is based solely on my training data through 2025-09, as the event is scheduled for 2026 and live research is not possible. A...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Sets Based on my historical knowledge (training data through 2025-09), both players tend to be quite resilient and their head-to-head encounters... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Angela Fita Boluda |
60%
Andrea Lazaro Garcia |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Angela Fita Boluda Angela Fita Boluda is the higher-ranked player and generally performs better on clay, which is the likely surface for this tournament based...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Given Angela Fita Boluda's favored status and expected dominance on clay, it's likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Andrea... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Angela Fita Boluda |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Angela Fita Boluda Based on training data through 2025, both players are clay-court specialists competing in the Montreux Nestlé Open on clay. Fita Boluda has...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 In women's ITF matches, the majority of matches are decided in two sets, especially between lower-ranked players where serve dominance is lo... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAngela Fita Boluda 5/5
Angela Fita Boluda is the higher-ranked Spanish player with more established WTA experience and a stronger baseline game. Andrea Lazaro Garc...
Training data through 2023 provides minimal detail on either player. Angela Fita Boluda holds a slight edge on clay surfaces common to this...
This prediction is based solely on my training data through 2025-09, as the event is scheduled for 2026 and live research is not possible. A...
Angela Fita Boluda is the higher-ranked player and generally performs better on clay, which is the likely surface for this tournament based...
Based on training data through 2025, both players are clay-court specialists competing in the Montreux Nestlé Open on clay. Fita Boluda has...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2.5 1/10
Both players are competitive and neither is a dominant force; grass courts often produce longer rallies and tighter break-point situations t...
Training data through 2023 shows these lower-ranked players often split sets on clay. Serve and return inconsistencies increase likelihood o...
Based on my historical knowledge (training data through 2025-09), both players tend to be quite resilient and their head-to-head encounters...
Given Angela Fita Boluda's favored status and expected dominance on clay, it's likely she will win this match in straight sets. While Andrea...
In women's ITF matches, the majority of matches are decided in two sets, especially between lower-ranked players where serve dominance is lo...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Angela Fita Boluda
Claude Haiku 4.5
Angela Fita Boluda
DeepSeek V3
Angela Fita Boluda
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Angela Fita Boluda
Grok 4 Fast
Angela Fita Boluda
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
22e45d3a49503d54…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 09:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38935,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Andrea Lazaro Garcia",
"home": "Angela Fita Boluda"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.