Ane Mintegi Del OlmovsElena Pridankina
EPAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 2/10 models |
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Without live ATP/WTA statistics, I estimate a competitive match between two mid-tier players on hard court as more likely to extend to 3 set...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Ane Mintegi Del Olmo is an established Spanish professional with consistent WTA/ITF circuit presence, while Elena Pridankina is a lesser-kno... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under |
53%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Training data through 2023 indicates both players often win in straight sets at this level. Limited depth suggests a shorter match is probab...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Training data through 2023 shows Ane Mintegi Del Olmo with stronger junior results on clay, common in Antalya ITF events. Elena Pridankina l... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
60%
Elena Pridankina |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Although Elena Pridankina is slightly favored, both players operate at a similar competitive level within the ITF circuit, meaning matches c...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elena Pridankina Based on available training data up to my last update, Elena Pridankina has generally shown a slightly higher level of consistent performanc... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
59%
Elena Pridankina |
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
59%
Elena Pridankina Given Ane Mintegi Del Olmo's expected advantage, it is likely she will win in straight sets. This prediction is based on general tennis know...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Ane Mintegi Del Olmo is the stronger player based on training data. She has a better track record and is expected to win this matchup. |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_2.5 |
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 These two are evenly matched on paper, and close three-set battles are common at this level, especially in early rounds. Both are capable of...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Based on training data through 2025-09, both players are young prospects, but Mintegi Del Olmo has shown better results on hard courts, whic... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Without live ATP/WTA statistics, I estimate a competitive match between two mid-tier players on hard court as more likely to extend to 3 set...
Training data through 2023 indicates both players often win in straight sets at this level. Limited depth suggests a shorter match is probab...
Although Elena Pridankina is slightly favored, both players operate at a similar competitive level within the ITF circuit, meaning matches c...
Given Ane Mintegi Del Olmo's expected advantage, it is likely she will win in straight sets. This prediction is based on general tennis know...
These two are evenly matched on paper, and close three-set battles are common at this level, especially in early rounds. Both are capable of...
Match winner
ConsensusAne Mintegi Del Olmo 4/5
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo is an established Spanish professional with consistent WTA/ITF circuit presence, while Elena Pridankina is a lesser-kno...
Training data through 2023 shows Ane Mintegi Del Olmo with stronger junior results on clay, common in Antalya ITF events. Elena Pridankina l...
Based on available training data up to my last update, Elena Pridankina has generally shown a slightly higher level of consistent performanc...
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo is the stronger player based on training data. She has a better track record and is expected to win this matchup.
Based on training data through 2025-09, both players are young prospects, but Mintegi Del Olmo has shown better results on hard courts, whic...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
DeepSeek V3
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elena Pridankina
Grok 4 Fast
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d564dffa9d2b8d06…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 12:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38965,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Elena Pridankina",
"home": "Ane Mintegi Del Olmo"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.