Andrey RublevvsOtto Virtanen
OVAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 3.5 1/10 models |
Andrey Rublev 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
56%
Over 38.5 |
62%
Andrey Rublev |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 38.5 Given the best-of-five format and the quality of both players' baseline games, a total game count above 38.5 reflects competitive set-play w...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Andrey Rublev Rublev has been the more consistent player on hard courts in recent years and brings higher ranking and form into the 2026 US Open. Cilic, n... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
over 3.5 |
73%
Andrey Rublev |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates Rublev often goes the distance against experienced opponents on hard courts. Cilic's serve can force...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
73%
Andrey Rublev Training data through 2025-09 shows Rublev maintaining stronger hard-court results and recent form than aging Cilic. Rublev's serve and move... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
78%
Andrey Rublev |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets This prediction assumes the market refers to Over/Under 3.5 sets in a best-of-5 match, based on my training data up to its last update. Whil...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Andrey Rublev This prediction is based on general knowledge from my training data up to its last update. By August 2026, Andrey Rublev is projected to sti... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
3 |
65%
Andrey Rublev |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
3 Given their head-to-head history and the potential for a closely contested match, there's a good chance this goes to three sets. Both player...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Andrey Rublev Rublev has a slight edge in their hard court head-to-head, winning 2 out of 3 encounters. While Cilic has a strong history at the US Open, R...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
over_3.5 |
72%
Andrey Rublev |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_3.5 In best-of-five Grand Slam matches, veterans like Cilic often push higher-ranked opponents early, and their experience can stretch matches....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Andrey Rublev Training data through 2025-09: Rublev is in better form, with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game ideal for hard courts. Cilic, wh... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 3.5 1/10
Given the best-of-five format and the quality of both players' baseline games, a total game count above 38.5 reflects competitive set-play w...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Rublev often goes the distance against experienced opponents on hard courts. Cilic's serve can force...
This prediction assumes the market refers to Over/Under 3.5 sets in a best-of-5 match, based on my training data up to its last update. Whil...
Given their head-to-head history and the potential for a closely contested match, there's a good chance this goes to three sets. Both player...
In best-of-five Grand Slam matches, veterans like Cilic often push higher-ranked opponents early, and their experience can stretch matches....
Match winner
ConsensusAndrey Rublev 5/5
Rublev has been the more consistent player on hard courts in recent years and brings higher ranking and form into the 2026 US Open. Cilic, n...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Rublev maintaining stronger hard-court results and recent form than aging Cilic. Rublev's serve and move...
This prediction is based on general knowledge from my training data up to its last update. By August 2026, Andrey Rublev is projected to sti...
Rublev has a slight edge in their hard court head-to-head, winning 2 out of 3 encounters. While Cilic has a strong history at the US Open, R...
Training data through 2025-09: Rublev is in better form, with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game ideal for hard courts. Cilic, wh...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Andrey Rublev
Grok 4 Fast
Andrey Rublev
DeepSeek V3
Andrey Rublev
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Andrey Rublev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Andrey Rublev
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6d56fe001b8b0546…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31726,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Marin Cilic",
"home": "Andrey Rublev"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.