Alina GranwehrvsLucie Nguyen Tan
LNAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alina Granwehr 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alina Granwehr |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alina Granwehr Both players are relatively low-ranked professionals competing in a secondary WTA 250 event. Granwehr, competing at home in Switzerland, typ...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At the secondary professional level, matches between closely ranked players on indoor hard courts (typical for September European events) te... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Alina Granwehr |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alina Granwehr Both players are Swiss and low-ranked; Granwehr has shown better recent results on clay in Swiss events per historical patterns. Nguyen Tan...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Early-round matches at this level often end in straight sets when one player holds a surface or experience edge. Both players lack deep runs... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Alina Granwehr |
58%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alina Granwehr Based on general career trajectory and potential 'home' support for Alina Granwehr in Switzerland, she is given a slight edge in this match....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Sets Given the expectation of a competitive match between two closely matched players at the professional level, a decisive third set is consider... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Alina Granwehr |
55%
Lucie Nguyen Tan |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alina Granwehr Alina Granwehr is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the professional tour. While Lucie Nguy...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Lucie Nguyen Tan Given Alina Granwehr's favored status and likely ability to control the match, it's probable that she will win in straight sets. Lucie Nguye... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Alina Granwehr |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alina Granwehr Alina Granwehr is a home favorite in this Montreux tournament and has superior ranking and experience on hard courts. Lucie Nguyen Tan is le...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players have the tools to win at least one set, with Nguyen Tan showing signs of form on hard courts. The match is unlikely to be a str... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlina Granwehr 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked professionals competing in a secondary WTA 250 event. Granwehr, competing at home in Switzerland, typ...
Both players are Swiss and low-ranked; Granwehr has shown better recent results on clay in Swiss events per historical patterns. Nguyen Tan...
Based on general career trajectory and potential 'home' support for Alina Granwehr in Switzerland, she is given a slight edge in this match....
Alina Granwehr is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the professional tour. While Lucie Nguy...
Alina Granwehr is a home favorite in this Montreux tournament and has superior ranking and experience on hard courts. Lucie Nguyen Tan is le...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
At the secondary professional level, matches between closely ranked players on indoor hard courts (typical for September European events) te...
Early-round matches at this level often end in straight sets when one player holds a surface or experience edge. Both players lack deep runs...
Given the expectation of a competitive match between two closely matched players at the professional level, a decisive third set is consider...
Given Alina Granwehr's favored status and likely ability to control the match, it's probable that she will win in straight sets. Lucie Nguye...
Both players have the tools to win at least one set, with Nguyen Tan showing signs of form on hard courts. The match is unlikely to be a str...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Alina Granwehr
Grok 4 Fast
Alina Granwehr
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alina Granwehr
DeepSeek V3
Alina Granwehr
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alina Granwehr
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
039ed0613d8ecb26…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 09:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39184,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T09:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lucie Nguyen Tan",
"home": "Alina Granwehr"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.