Alicia Herrero LinanavsAne Mintegi Del Olmo
AMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo 3/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alicia Herrero Linana Both players are lower-ranked Spanish/Basque professionals competing at the ATIK Antalya Open, a secondary tour event. Without access to liv...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Lower-ranked ITF/secondary tour players at Antalya typically produce competitive, grinding matches with extended rallies and frequent break... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles; Ane Mintegi Del Olmo has shown marginally better junior results on...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Lower-level ITF matches frequently end in straight sets when one player holds a slight edge. Serve and return metrics are unknown but favor... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
52%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Based on my training data up to my last update, Ane Mintegi Del Olmo demonstrated higher potential as a junior player, notably winning a Gra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over_2.5 Given that both players are competing on the professional ITF circuit, matches tend to be hard-fought and competitive. While Ane Mintegi Del... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alicia Herrero Linana Both players are largely unproven at the professional level, with limited data available. However, Alicia Herrero Linana shows a slightly mo...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given the limited professional experience and potentially inconsistent play from both players, it's likely that matches between them will go...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo |
65%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo Based on training data through 2025-09, Ane Mintegi Del Olmo has shown stronger results on hard courts in ITF events and holds a more aggres...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 1.5 Both players are evenly matched in terms of level, and their matches often extend to three sets. Mintegi Del Olmo's aggressive play can lead... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAne Mintegi Del Olmo 3/5
Both players are lower-ranked Spanish/Basque professionals competing at the ATIK Antalya Open, a secondary tour event. Without access to liv...
Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles; Ane Mintegi Del Olmo has shown marginally better junior results on...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Ane Mintegi Del Olmo demonstrated higher potential as a junior player, notably winning a Gra...
Both players are largely unproven at the professional level, with limited data available. However, Alicia Herrero Linana shows a slightly mo...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Ane Mintegi Del Olmo has shown stronger results on hard courts in ITF events and holds a more aggres...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Lower-ranked ITF/secondary tour players at Antalya typically produce competitive, grinding matches with extended rallies and frequent break...
Lower-level ITF matches frequently end in straight sets when one player holds a slight edge. Serve and return metrics are unknown but favor...
Given that both players are competing on the professional ITF circuit, matches tend to be hard-fought and competitive. While Ane Mintegi Del...
Given the limited professional experience and potentially inconsistent play from both players, it's likely that matches between them will go...
Both players are evenly matched in terms of level, and their matches often extend to three sets. Mintegi Del Olmo's aggressive play can lead...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alicia Herrero Linana
Grok 4 Fast
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alicia Herrero Linana
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
86967a16c5c67114…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 10 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39478,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-10T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ane Mintegi Del Olmo",
"home": "Alicia Herrero Linana"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.