Alicia Herrero LinanavsAlevtina Ibragimova
AIYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alicia Herrero Linana 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alicia Herrero Linana Alicia Herrero Linana is a Spanish clay-court specialist competing in the ATIK Antalya Open (hard court tournament in Turkey). Without acces...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are mid-ranked professionals on the WTA Challenger circuit with comparable baseline strength and serve consistency. Herrero Lin... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
61%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alicia Herrero Linana Alicia Herrero Linana is listed as the home player on an outdoor hard court in Antalya and receives the benefit of familiarity in a low-prof...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 2.5 Both players lack high-level recent results in training data, pointing to a straight-sets outcome rather than a three-set battle. Hard-court... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alicia Herrero Linana Based on available training data up to my last update, Alicia Herrero Linana generally possesses more experience and a slightly higher level...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 While Alicia Herrero Linana holds an edge, she is not typically an overwhelming force on hard courts, allowing opponents to take sets. Alevt...
1 source cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Alicia Herrero Linana |
65%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alicia Herrero Linana Alicia Herrero Linana is the stronger player based on my training data. She generally performs better on hard courts, which is likely the su...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Alevtina Ibragimova Given Alicia Herrero Linana's general dominance and Ibragimova's potential for errors, it is likely that Herrero Linana will win this match... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
52%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova No live access, so this is predicted from training knowledge through 2025-09. Both players are lower-tier ITF-level competitors, but Ibragim...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over 2.5 Both players operate at a similar low-level ITF standard, which typically produces tight, momentum-swinging sets where breaks come in bunche... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlicia Herrero Linana 4/5
Alicia Herrero Linana is a Spanish clay-court specialist competing in the ATIK Antalya Open (hard court tournament in Turkey). Without acces...
Alicia Herrero Linana is listed as the home player on an outdoor hard court in Antalya and receives the benefit of familiarity in a low-prof...
Based on available training data up to my last update, Alicia Herrero Linana generally possesses more experience and a slightly higher level...
Alicia Herrero Linana is the stronger player based on my training data. She generally performs better on hard courts, which is likely the su...
No live access, so this is predicted from training knowledge through 2025-09. Both players are lower-tier ITF-level competitors, but Ibragim...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both players are mid-ranked professionals on the WTA Challenger circuit with comparable baseline strength and serve consistency. Herrero Lin...
Both players lack high-level recent results in training data, pointing to a straight-sets outcome rather than a three-set battle. Hard-court...
While Alicia Herrero Linana holds an edge, she is not typically an overwhelming force on hard courts, allowing opponents to take sets. Alevt...
Given Alicia Herrero Linana's general dominance and Ibragimova's potential for errors, it is likely that Herrero Linana will win this match...
Both players operate at a similar low-level ITF standard, which typically produces tight, momentum-swinging sets where breaks come in bunche...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Alicia Herrero Linana
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alicia Herrero Linana
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alicia Herrero Linana
Grok 4 Fast
Alicia Herrero Linana
DeepSeek V3
Alevtina Ibragimova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cced632cd9e53b5d…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 11:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 42027,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T11:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alevtina Ibragimova",
"home": "Alicia Herrero Linana"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.