Aliaksandra SasnovichvsVendula Valdmannova
VVAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Under 2.5 2/10 models |
Aliaksandra Sasnovich 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
65%
Under 2.5 |
72%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sasnovich's superiority in ranking, experience, and hard-court game suggests she is more likely to control the match and avoid extended rall...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Sasnovich is a veteran WTA player with established ranking and Grand Slam experience, whereas Valdmannova is a lesser-known qualifier or low... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
71%
under_2.5 |
82%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
under_2.5 Sasnovich typically dispatches lower-tier qualifiers in straight sets on hard courts. Training data through 2025-09 indicates she rarely dro...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Sasnovich holds far higher career ranking and experience on hard courts than Valdmannova. Training data through 2025-09 shows Sasnovich cons... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Under 2.5 |
85%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 2.5 Given the expected disparity in skill and experience, Aliaksandra Sasnovich is highly likely to secure a victory in straight sets. A 2-0 sco...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Based on my training data through 2025-09, Aliaksandra Sasnovich is a seasoned WTA professional with considerable Grand Slam experience and... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
2.5 |
70%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 While Sasnovich is favored, Valdmannova is capable of pushing matches, especially if Sasnovich has any off days or if Valdmannova finds her...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Aliaksandra Sasnovich is a more established player with a higher ranking and more experience on the WTA tour, suggesting she should be favor... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_2.5 |
60%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature of the matchup and Valdmannova's fighting spirit, this match is likely to go to three sets. Sasnovich is favore...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Training data through 2025. Sasnovich has more experience on hard courts and is a higher-ranked player, while Valdmannova is less establishe... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 2/10
Sasnovich's superiority in ranking, experience, and hard-court game suggests she is more likely to control the match and avoid extended rall...
Sasnovich typically dispatches lower-tier qualifiers in straight sets on hard courts. Training data through 2025-09 indicates she rarely dro...
Given the expected disparity in skill and experience, Aliaksandra Sasnovich is highly likely to secure a victory in straight sets. A 2-0 sco...
While Sasnovich is favored, Valdmannova is capable of pushing matches, especially if Sasnovich has any off days or if Valdmannova finds her...
Given the competitive nature of the matchup and Valdmannova's fighting spirit, this match is likely to go to three sets. Sasnovich is favore...
Match winner
ConsensusAliaksandra Sasnovich 5/5
Sasnovich is a veteran WTA player with established ranking and Grand Slam experience, whereas Valdmannova is a lesser-known qualifier or low...
Sasnovich holds far higher career ranking and experience on hard courts than Valdmannova. Training data through 2025-09 shows Sasnovich cons...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Aliaksandra Sasnovich is a seasoned WTA professional with considerable Grand Slam experience and...
Aliaksandra Sasnovich is a more established player with a higher ranking and more experience on the WTA tour, suggesting she should be favor...
Training data through 2025. Sasnovich has more experience on hard courts and is a higher-ranked player, while Valdmannova is less establishe...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Grok 4 Fast
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Claude Haiku 4.5
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
DeepSeek V3
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a550b4f64534bbd9…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 22:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31505,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Vendula Valdmannova",
"home": "Aliaksandra Sasnovich"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.