Alexis GalarneauvsKeegan Smith
KSYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alexis Galarneau 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Alexis Galarneau |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alexis Galarneau Both players are relatively low-ranked ATP challengers with limited US Open main draw history in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Galarnea...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 At the US Open early rounds, matched Challenger-tier players with comparable hard-court skills tend to produce competitive matches. Galarnea... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Alexis Galarneau |
55%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Alexis Galarneau Alexis Galarneau holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than Keegan Smith based on pre-2025 data. Galarneau's experience in AT...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Lower-ranked players in US Open matches often extend to three sets on hard courts. Galarneau's serve is solid but not dominant enough for st... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Alexis Galarneau |
40%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alexis Galarneau Based on historical performance data from my training knowledge up to my last update, Alexis Galarneau has generally achieved slightly bette...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 sets Given that both players are competitive on hard courts and appear quite evenly matched based on their career profiles from training knowledg... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Galarneau |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Galarneau Based on my training data, Alexis Galarneau is generally considered the stronger player between these two. He typically performs better on h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given the perceived closeness of the match and the hard court surface, it's likely to be a competitive encounter. Alexis Galarneau's style o... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Alexis Galarneau |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alexis Galarneau Training data through 2025-09 indicates Galarneau has higher career highs and more experience on hard courts, though neither player is a top...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Given the relative closeness in level between two unseeded players at a Grand Slam, a four or five-set match is plausible. Neither player is... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlexis Galarneau 4/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked ATP challengers with limited US Open main draw history in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Galarnea...
Alexis Galarneau holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results than Keegan Smith based on pre-2025 data. Galarneau's experience in AT...
Based on historical performance data from my training knowledge up to my last update, Alexis Galarneau has generally achieved slightly bette...
Based on my training data, Alexis Galarneau is generally considered the stronger player between these two. He typically performs better on h...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Galarneau has higher career highs and more experience on hard courts, though neither player is a top...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
At the US Open early rounds, matched Challenger-tier players with comparable hard-court skills tend to produce competitive matches. Galarnea...
Lower-ranked players in US Open matches often extend to three sets on hard courts. Galarneau's serve is solid but not dominant enough for st...
Given that both players are competitive on hard courts and appear quite evenly matched based on their career profiles from training knowledg...
Given the perceived closeness of the match and the hard court surface, it's likely to be a competitive encounter. Alexis Galarneau's style o...
Given the relative closeness in level between two unseeded players at a Grand Slam, a four or five-set match is plausible. Neither player is...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Alexis Galarneau
DeepSeek V3
Alexis Galarneau
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Galarneau
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alexis Galarneau
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alexis Galarneau
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4efeb47af32c4861…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30772,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Keegan Smith",
"home": "Alexis Galarneau"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.