Alexandra OsbornevsAriana Arseneault
AAYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alexandra Osborne 4/5 models |
Over 21.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Alexandra Osborne |
54%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alexandra Osborne Both players are relatively low-ranked and outside typical ATP/WTA mainstream exposure; my training data (cutoff 2025-09) does not provide r...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 Without recent form, serve strength, or head-to-head data, I assume a competitive match between two lower-ranked professionals at a WTA/ATP-... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Alexandra Osborne |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alexandra Osborne No live data available for 2026 match; prediction from training knowledge through late 2023. Alexandra Osborne listed as home player and giv...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Training data through 2023 shows many ITF-level hard-court matches end in straight sets. Limited player profiles suggest serve-dominant styl... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Alexandra Osborne |
52%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alexandra Osborne Alexandra Osborne's more extensive experience on the professional circuit, particularly on hard courts, gives her a slight edge. Ariana Arse...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under 2.5 Sets While Osborne is favored, Arseneault is known for her resilience, suggesting a straightforward two-set victory for either player is not guar... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Alexandra Osborne |
60%
Ariana Arseneault |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Alexandra Osborne Based on training data, Alexandra Osborne has a slightly stronger historical performance profile in WTA tournaments compared to Ariana Arsen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Ariana Arseneault Given the slight edge for Alexandra Osborne in their head-to-head, a match extending to three sets is plausible. However, Osborne's historic... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Ariana Arseneault |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Ariana Arseneault Training data through 2025-09 suggests Arseneault has a stronger recent hard-court record and higher baseline level on this surface. Osborne...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players are competitive at this level often pushing matches to three sets, especially on hard courts where rallies are longer. Arseneau... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlexandra Osborne 4/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked and outside typical ATP/WTA mainstream exposure; my training data (cutoff 2025-09) does not provide r...
No live data available for 2026 match; prediction from training knowledge through late 2023. Alexandra Osborne listed as home player and giv...
Alexandra Osborne's more extensive experience on the professional circuit, particularly on hard courts, gives her a slight edge. Ariana Arse...
Based on training data, Alexandra Osborne has a slightly stronger historical performance profile in WTA tournaments compared to Ariana Arsen...
Training data through 2025-09 suggests Arseneault has a stronger recent hard-court record and higher baseline level on this surface. Osborne...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 2/10
Without recent form, serve strength, or head-to-head data, I assume a competitive match between two lower-ranked professionals at a WTA/ATP-...
Training data through 2023 shows many ITF-level hard-court matches end in straight sets. Limited player profiles suggest serve-dominant styl...
While Osborne is favored, Arseneault is known for her resilience, suggesting a straightforward two-set victory for either player is not guar...
Given the slight edge for Alexandra Osborne in their head-to-head, a match extending to three sets is plausible. However, Osborne's historic...
Both players are competitive at this level often pushing matches to three sets, especially on hard courts where rallies are longer. Arseneau...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alexandra Osborne
DeepSeek V3
Ariana Arseneault
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alexandra Osborne
Grok 4 Fast
Alexandra Osborne
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alexandra Osborne
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6c66b1a081b5f253…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 14:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30533,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T14:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ariana Arseneault",
"home": "Alexandra Osborne"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.