Alex MichelsenvsFrances Tiafoe
FTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Frances Tiafoe 3/5 models |
over_3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Frances Tiafoe |
61%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Frances Tiafoe Tiafoe has consistently demonstrated superior hard-court credentials and ATP-level experience compared to Michelsen, who is still building h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
Over 2.5 Both players are young with solid baseline games and capable of competing for extended periods on hard court. Neither is a dominant force ex... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Frances Tiafoe |
57%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Frances Tiafoe Tiafoe holds the edge in experience and hard-court results against younger opponents; Michelsen remains unproven at grand-slam depth in best...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over_3.5 Both players possess strong serves that limit early breaks on outdoor hard courts. Grand-slam best-of-five format plus comparable baseline g... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
73%
Frances Tiafoe |
70%
Under 4.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
73%
Frances Tiafoe Given the match date in 2026, these predictions are based on my training data knowledge of both players up to my last update. Frances Tiafoe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 4.5 sets Considering Tiafoe as the favorite, it is likely he will close out the match in either three or four sets. Michelsen's talent could push a s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Alex Michelsen |
65%
Frances Tiafoe |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alex Michelsen Based on training data, Alex Michelsen is a rising talent with a strong hard-court game, while Frances Tiafoe has shown inconsistency. Miche...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Frances Tiafoe Given the relatively even matchup and the players' styles, a close contest is expected. It's likely to go to a deciding set, but Michelsen's... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Alex Michelsen |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alex Michelsen Based on training data through September 2025, Alex Michelsen has shown steady improvement on hard courts, while Frances Tiafoe's form has b...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Both players possess strong serving games and have the stamina for five-set matches in Grand Slam conditions. Their head-to-head encounters... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFrances Tiafoe 3/5
Tiafoe has consistently demonstrated superior hard-court credentials and ATP-level experience compared to Michelsen, who is still building h...
Tiafoe holds the edge in experience and hard-court results against younger opponents; Michelsen remains unproven at grand-slam depth in best...
Given the match date in 2026, these predictions are based on my training data knowledge of both players up to my last update. Frances Tiafoe...
Based on training data, Alex Michelsen is a rising talent with a strong hard-court game, while Frances Tiafoe has shown inconsistency. Miche...
Based on training data through September 2025, Alex Michelsen has shown steady improvement on hard courts, while Frances Tiafoe's form has b...
Over / Under
Consensusover_3.5 1/10
Both players are young with solid baseline games and capable of competing for extended periods on hard court. Neither is a dominant force ex...
Both players possess strong serves that limit early breaks on outdoor hard courts. Grand-slam best-of-five format plus comparable baseline g...
Considering Tiafoe as the favorite, it is likely he will close out the match in either three or four sets. Michelsen's talent could push a s...
Given the relatively even matchup and the players' styles, a close contest is expected. It's likely to go to a deciding set, but Michelsen's...
Both players possess strong serving games and have the stamina for five-set matches in Grand Slam conditions. Their head-to-head encounters...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Frances Tiafoe
Grok 4 Fast
Frances Tiafoe
Claude Haiku 4.5
Frances Tiafoe
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alex Michelsen
DeepSeek V3
Alex Michelsen
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4dd0d33422f3af86…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 18:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39003,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Frances Tiafoe",
"home": "Alex Michelsen"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.