Alevtina IbragimovavsAurora Zantedeschi
AZYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
Alevtina Ibragimova 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
62%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 At this level of women's tennis (secondary circuit, non-Grand Slam), matches rarely feature dominant straight-set wins unless there is a sig...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alevtina Ibragimova Both players are relatively lower-ranked WTA professionals competing in a secondary circuit (ATIK Antalya Open). Ibragimova, a Russian playe... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
over_2.5 |
52%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Training data through 2025-09. Limited player data suggests competitive match likely to go distance on outdoor surface. Best-of-3 format fav...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Alevtina Ibragimova Training data through 2025-09. No head-to-head or recent form available for these ITF-level players in 2026. Home player Ibragimova given sl... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
52%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Without current form or performance data, matches between similarly ranked players often extend to a deciding third set. A tight contest is...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Alevtina Ibragimova Based solely on my training data through 2025-09, with no specific player form or head-to-head records available for this particular match.... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Aurora Zantedeschi |
65%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Aurora Zantedeschi Given that Alevtina Ibragimova is the slight favorite, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. While Aurora Zantedeschi could potent...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Alevtina Ibragimova Based on training data, Alevtina Ibragimova generally demonstrates stronger performance on hard courts, which is likely the surface for this... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over 2.5 |
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Ibragimova holds an edge but Zantedeschi is a determined competitor who often pushes matches to three sets, especially on hard courts where...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alevtina Ibragimova Training data through 2025-09: Ibragimova, a rising Russian player, has shown stronger recent form on hard courts compared to Zantedeschi, w... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
At this level of women's tennis (secondary circuit, non-Grand Slam), matches rarely feature dominant straight-set wins unless there is a sig...
Training data through 2025-09. Limited player data suggests competitive match likely to go distance on outdoor surface. Best-of-3 format fav...
Without current form or performance data, matches between similarly ranked players often extend to a deciding third set. A tight contest is...
Given that Alevtina Ibragimova is the slight favorite, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. While Aurora Zantedeschi could potent...
Ibragimova holds an edge but Zantedeschi is a determined competitor who often pushes matches to three sets, especially on hard courts where...
Match winner
ConsensusAlevtina Ibragimova 5/5
Both players are relatively lower-ranked WTA professionals competing in a secondary circuit (ATIK Antalya Open). Ibragimova, a Russian playe...
Training data through 2025-09. No head-to-head or recent form available for these ITF-level players in 2026. Home player Ibragimova given sl...
Based solely on my training data through 2025-09, with no specific player form or head-to-head records available for this particular match....
Based on training data, Alevtina Ibragimova generally demonstrates stronger performance on hard courts, which is likely the surface for this...
Training data through 2025-09: Ibragimova, a rising Russian player, has shown stronger recent form on hard courts compared to Zantedeschi, w...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alevtina Ibragimova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alevtina Ibragimova
DeepSeek V3
Alevtina Ibragimova
Grok 4 Fast
Alevtina Ibragimova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alevtina Ibragimova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7cd73351e97a0ca4…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 11 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39798,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-11T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 11 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Aurora Zantedeschi",
"home": "Alevtina Ibragimova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.