Aleksandar KovacevicvsFelix Balshaw
FBYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Aleksandar Kovacevic 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Aleksandar Kovacevic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Aleksandar Kovacevic Kovacevic is an established ATP player with solid hard-court credentials and regular tour experience, while Balshaw is a lower-ranked or eme...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Hard-court tennis at Winston-Salem often produces competitive matches with rallies that go to multiple sets, especially if both players have... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
81%
Aleksandar Kovacevic |
67%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
81%
Aleksandar Kovacevic Kovacevic holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Balshaw on hard courts. Recent form shows Kovacevic consistently reaching later rou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
67%
under 2.5 Kovacevic is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-3 format and hard-court serve strength reduce the chance of a th... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Aleksandar Kovacevic |
70%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Aleksandar Kovacevic Aleksandar Kovacevic is a known professional ATP player with a strong hard-court record. Felix Balshaw is not recognized in my training data...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 2.5 sets Given the significant experience and skill gap favoring Aleksandar Kovacevic against an unknown opponent, a straightforward straight-sets vi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
95%
Aleksandar Kovacevic |
70%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Aleksandar Kovacevic Aleksandar Kovacevic is significantly higher ranked at World No. 79 compared to Felix Balshaw's World No. 936. This vast difference in ranki...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
under Given the significant disparity in rankings, Aleksandar Kovacevic is expected to win comfortably against Felix Balshaw. This dominance sugge...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Aleksandar Kovacevic |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Aleksandar Kovacevic Based on training data through 2025-09, Kovacevic has consistently performed well on hard courts and has a higher ranking. Balshaw is less e...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Both players are competitive, and matches in Winston-Salem often go to three sets. Given the lack of a dominant favorite, the over 2.5 sets... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAleksandar Kovacevic 5/5
Kovacevic is an established ATP player with solid hard-court credentials and regular tour experience, while Balshaw is a lower-ranked or eme...
Kovacevic holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Balshaw on hard courts. Recent form shows Kovacevic consistently reaching later rou...
Aleksandar Kovacevic is a known professional ATP player with a strong hard-court record. Felix Balshaw is not recognized in my training data...
Aleksandar Kovacevic is significantly higher ranked at World No. 79 compared to Felix Balshaw's World No. 936. This vast difference in ranki...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Kovacevic has consistently performed well on hard courts and has a higher ranking. Balshaw is less e...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Hard-court tennis at Winston-Salem often produces competitive matches with rallies that go to multiple sets, especially if both players have...
Kovacevic is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-3 format and hard-court serve strength reduce the chance of a th...
Given the significant experience and skill gap favoring Aleksandar Kovacevic against an unknown opponent, a straightforward straight-sets vi...
Given the significant disparity in rankings, Aleksandar Kovacevic is expected to win comfortably against Felix Balshaw. This dominance sugge...
Both players are competitive, and matches in Winston-Salem often go to three sets. Given the lack of a dominant favorite, the over 2.5 sets...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Grok 4 Fast
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Aleksandar Kovacevic
DeepSeek V3
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4c4f2b6f2768bca4…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 21:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30852,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Felix Balshaw",
"home": "Aleksandar Kovacevic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.