Adrian MannarinovsThiago Agustin Tirante
TAAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Adrian Mannarino 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Adrian Mannarino |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Adrian Mannarino Mannarino is an established ATP veteran with a strong record on hard courts and experience in Grand Slam main draws, whereas Tirante is a lo...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Although Mannarino is favored, Tirante has the physical tools and toughness typical of Argentine clay-court specialists adapting to hard cou... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Adrian Mannarino |
61%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Adrian Mannarino Mannarino holds more experience on outdoor hard courts at majors while Tirante remains inconsistent away from clay. Head-to-head favors the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
over_3.5 Both players prefer baseline rallies that extend sets; Tirante's youth suggests he can force a fourth or fifth set. Historical US Open match... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Adrian Mannarino |
65%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Adrian Mannarino This prediction is based on general player profiles and historical performance from my training data, as specific real-time form for a 2026...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Sets Even though Mannarino is favored, Tirante is a capable player who can challenge for sets, especially if his serve is effective. Grand Slam m... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Adrian Mannarino |
60%
Thiago Agustin Tirante |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Adrian Mannarino Adrian Mannarino is the more experienced player and has a higher ATP ranking, suggesting he is the favorite. While Tirante has shown flashes...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Thiago Agustin Tirante Given Mannarino's favored status and the expected competitiveness of the match, it's likely to go to three sets. However, Mannarino's experi... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Adrian Mannarino |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Adrian Mannarino Training data through 2025-09 indicates Mannarino's experience on hard courts and higher ranking give him an edge. Tirante is competitive bu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Both players have the ability to win sets, and Mannarino's style often leads to competitive matches. Tirante's determination could extend th... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAdrian Mannarino 5/5
Mannarino is an established ATP veteran with a strong record on hard courts and experience in Grand Slam main draws, whereas Tirante is a lo...
Mannarino holds more experience on outdoor hard courts at majors while Tirante remains inconsistent away from clay. Head-to-head favors the...
This prediction is based on general player profiles and historical performance from my training data, as specific real-time form for a 2026...
Adrian Mannarino is the more experienced player and has a higher ATP ranking, suggesting he is the favorite. While Tirante has shown flashes...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Mannarino's experience on hard courts and higher ranking give him an edge. Tirante is competitive bu...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
Although Mannarino is favored, Tirante has the physical tools and toughness typical of Argentine clay-court specialists adapting to hard cou...
Both players prefer baseline rallies that extend sets; Tirante's youth suggests he can force a fourth or fifth set. Historical US Open match...
Even though Mannarino is favored, Tirante is a capable player who can challenge for sets, especially if his serve is effective. Grand Slam m...
Given Mannarino's favored status and the expected competitiveness of the match, it's likely to go to three sets. However, Mannarino's experi...
Both players have the ability to win sets, and Mannarino's style often leads to competitive matches. Tirante's determination could extend th...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Adrian Mannarino
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Adrian Mannarino
Claude Haiku 4.5
Adrian Mannarino
DeepSeek V3
Adrian Mannarino
Grok 4 Fast
Adrian Mannarino
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
54b713e961ab26b5…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 16:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31716,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Thiago Agustin Tirante",
"home": "Adrian Mannarino"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.