Adrian MannarinovsAlexander Bublik
ABAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Adrian Mannarino 3/5 models |
Over 36.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Adrian Mannarino |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Adrian Mannarino Mannarino is a crafty left-hander with a strong record on hard courts, particularly at the US Open where he has shown consistency in recent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players are baseline grinders who rarely produce blowout matches at the US Open. Mannarino's defensive style and Bublik's aggressive-bu... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Alexander Bublik |
71%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alexander Bublik Bublik holds the edge in recent hard-court results and serve power against older opponents. Mannarino's movement has declined noticeably pas...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
over 2.5 Mannarino rarely exits in straight sets against big servers like Bublik. Expect at least one break-back set given Mannarino's experience and... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Adrian Mannarino |
70%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Adrian Mannarino My predictions are based on training data through mid-2024, as real-time information for a 2026 match is unavailable. Adrian Mannarino's con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 Given the contrasting styles, a straightforward 3-0 victory for either player seems less likely. Mannarino's ability to grind and Bublik's p... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Alexander Bublik |
55%
3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alexander Bublik Alexander Bublik holds a 3-2 head-to-head advantage over Adrian Mannarino. Bublik's aggressive style and strong serve on hard courts give hi...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
3.5 Given their head-to-head history, which includes some close matches, and their similar recent form on hard courts, this match has the potent...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Adrian Mannarino |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Adrian Mannarino Based on training data through 2025-09, Mannarino holds a 2-1 edge in head-to-head meetings, including a win on hard courts. Mannarino's con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Both players have shown inconsistent form on hard courts, and their matches often go to four or five sets, especially in Grand Slams. Bublik... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAdrian Mannarino 3/5
Mannarino is a crafty left-hander with a strong record on hard courts, particularly at the US Open where he has shown consistency in recent...
Bublik holds the edge in recent hard-court results and serve power against older opponents. Mannarino's movement has declined noticeably pas...
My predictions are based on training data through mid-2024, as real-time information for a 2026 match is unavailable. Adrian Mannarino's con...
Alexander Bublik holds a 3-2 head-to-head advantage over Adrian Mannarino. Bublik's aggressive style and strong serve on hard courts give hi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Mannarino holds a 2-1 edge in head-to-head meetings, including a win on hard courts. Mannarino's con...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 36.5 2/10
Both players are baseline grinders who rarely produce blowout matches at the US Open. Mannarino's defensive style and Bublik's aggressive-bu...
Mannarino rarely exits in straight sets against big servers like Bublik. Expect at least one break-back set given Mannarino's experience and...
Given the contrasting styles, a straightforward 3-0 victory for either player seems less likely. Mannarino's ability to grind and Bublik's p...
Given their head-to-head history, which includes some close matches, and their similar recent form on hard courts, this match has the potent...
Both players have shown inconsistent form on hard courts, and their matches often go to four or five sets, especially in Grand Slams. Bublik...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Alexander Bublik
Claude Haiku 4.5
Adrian Mannarino
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alexander Bublik
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Adrian Mannarino
DeepSeek V3
Adrian Mannarino
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
aed1280587dde370…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35127,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alexander Bublik",
"home": "Adrian Mannarino"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.